Improve guard for triton compatibility #1497
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
The docs for this PR live here. All of your documentation changes will be reflected on that endpoint. The docs are available until 30 days after the last update. |
Titus-von-Koeller
approved these changes
Jan 30, 2025
Collaborator
Titus-von-Koeller
left a comment
Titus-von-Koeller
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
LGTM, thanks for taking the lead on that!
matthewdouglas
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 6, 2025
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
For the Triton functionality we need to guard beyond simply checking if the
tritonpackage is installed. This updates the guard to verify that there is also a supported triton backend.@winglian @Titus-von-Koeller