Skip to content

refactor: use multistage image approach to reduce size#89

Open
ZuBB wants to merge 1 commit intoblaise-io:masterfrom
ZuBB:slimmer-docker-image
Open

refactor: use multistage image approach to reduce size#89
ZuBB wants to merge 1 commit intoblaise-io:masterfrom
ZuBB:slimmer-docker-image

Conversation

@ZuBB
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@ZuBB ZuBB commented May 16, 2024

Hello @blaise-io,

I saw that you bumped the image version recently and decided to share the changes I made some time ago finally. I managed to reduce the image size by 15Mb. I hope this change is worth including in mainline

vv@my-precious ~/work/own/acelink/acelink $ docker image ls
REPOSITORY                    TAG       IMAGE ID       CREATED          SIZE
blaiseio/acelink              2.1.0     7a4811d95467   12 minutes ago   328MB
blaiseio/acelink-orig         2.1.0     03f43dd5bd45   9 days ago       343MB
docker/disk-usage-extension   0.2.9     83bc5b217a10   3 months ago     2.82MB
docker/getting-started        latest    289dc403af49   17 months ago    46.5MB
vv@my-precious ~/work/own/acelink/acelink $ 

@blaise-io
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

I don't trust apteno/alpine-jq and Alpine is not supported by Acestream, can you base it on ubuntu:focal?

@ZuBB
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

ZuBB commented May 16, 2024

I don't trust apteno/alpine-jq and Alpine is not supported by Acestream, can you base it on ubuntu:focal?

apteno/alpine-jq is used for downloading acestream only. Acestream still runs on top of Ubuntu (multistage build). Accordingly to dockerhub this image has been pulled 100M times. Seems like ppl have some trust in it.

Do you still wanna drop it?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants