Skip to content

Conversation

@Jrakru
Copy link
Contributor

@Jrakru Jrakru commented Oct 19, 2025

Summary

  • align every workflow-status path so epic retrospectives hand off to the Scrum Master, matching documentation and actual SM ownership
  • update the story-approved workflow's next-step guidance so completed epics are routed to the SM for retrospectives
  • keeps workflow-status recommendations and exported prompts consistent with the process teams follow after an epic closes

Testing

  • manual: rebuilt BMAD agents and regenerated Codex prompts to verify the SM ownership propagates

Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings October 19, 2025 13:57
Copy link
Contributor

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull Request Overview

Align retrospective ownership to the Scrum Master across workflows and guidance, matching documented process.

  • Switch retrospective step agent from pm to sm in multiple workflow-status paths
  • Update story-approved instructions to direct users to run the retrospective with the SM agent

Reviewed Changes

Copilot reviewed 7 out of 7 changed files in this pull request and generated 2 comments.

Show a summary per file
File Description
src/modules/bmm/workflows/workflow-status/paths/greenfield-level-4.yaml Set retrospective step agent to sm for epic completion
src/modules/bmm/workflows/workflow-status/paths/greenfield-level-3.yaml Set retrospective step agent to sm for epic completion
src/modules/bmm/workflows/workflow-status/paths/greenfield-level-2.yaml Set retrospective step agent to sm for epic completion
src/modules/bmm/workflows/workflow-status/paths/game-design.yaml Set retrospective step agent to sm for retrospective in feature flow
src/modules/bmm/workflows/workflow-status/paths/brownfield-level-4.yaml Set retrospective step agent to sm for epic completion
src/modules/bmm/workflows/workflow-status/paths/brownfield-level-3.yaml Set retrospective step agent to sm for epic completion
src/modules/bmm/workflows/4-implementation/story-approved/instructions.md Update next-step guidance to use SM agent for retrospective

Tip: Customize your code reviews with copilot-instructions.md. Create the file or learn how to get started.

**Next Steps:**

1. Run `retrospective` workflow with PM agent to review the project
1. Run `retrospective` workflow with SM agent to review the project
Copy link

Copilot AI Oct 19, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

[nitpick] Consider expanding the acronym for clarity: 'Run retrospective workflow with Scrum Master (SM) agent to review the project' to make this instruction self-explanatory for new contributors.

Suggested change
1. Run `retrospective` workflow with SM agent to review the project
1. Run `retrospective` workflow with Scrum Master (SM) agent to review the project

Copilot uses AI. Check for mistakes.
Comment on lines 101 to 106
epic_completion:
- id: "retrospective"
recommended: true
agent: "pm"
agent: "sm"
command: "retrospective"

Copy link

Copilot AI Oct 19, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

[nitpick] The retrospective step definition is duplicated across multiple path files. Consider extracting a shared YAML anchor or central include for the epic_completion.retrospective step (with agent: 'sm') to keep all paths consistent and reduce future drift.

Copilot uses AI. Check for mistakes.
@alexeyv
Copy link
Contributor

alexeyv commented Oct 20, 2025

I have reviewed and tested this. Looks good.

  • Rebased on latest v6-alpha (2a6eb71)
  • Installed BMAD to test environment and verified all generated files show correct SM ownership
  • No conflicts, clean rebase
  • All workflow-status YAML files install correctly with `agent: "sm"`

@bmadcode bmadcode merged commit c2b3e79 into bmad-code-org:v6-alpha Oct 20, 2025
6 checks passed
@alexeyv alexeyv self-requested a review October 20, 2025 12:51
@alexeyv
Copy link
Contributor

alexeyv commented Oct 20, 2025

@Jrakru thank you!

@alexeyv alexeyv removed their request for review October 20, 2025 12:54
@bmadcode
Copy link
Collaborator

Thanks for catching this @Jrakru !

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants