Update module github.com/ulikunitz/xz to v0.5.15 [SECURITY]

[bootc-bot]

This PR contains the following updates:

Package	Change	Age	Confidence
github.com/ulikunitz/xz	v0.5.11 -> v0.5.15

---

Warning

Some dependencies could not be looked up. Check the Dependency Dashboard for more information.

GitHub Vulnerability Alerts

CVE-2025-58058

Summary

It is possible to put data in front of an LZMA-encoded byte stream without detecting the situation while reading the header. This can lead to increased memory consumption because the current implementation allocates the full decoding buffer directly after reading the header. The LZMA header doesn't include a magic number or has a checksum to detect such an issue according to the specification.

Note that the code recognizes the issue later while reading the stream, but at this time the memory allocation has already been done.

Mitigations

The release v0.5.15 includes following mitigations:

• The ReaderConfig DictCap field is now interpreted as a limit for the dictionary size.
• The default is 2 Gigabytes - 1 byte (2^31-1 bytes).
• Users can check with the [Reader.Header] method what the actual values are in their LZMA files and set a smaller limit using ReaderConfig.
• The dictionary size will not exceed the larger of the file size and the minimum dictionary size. This is another measure to prevent huge memory allocations for the dictionary.
• The code supports stream sizes only up to a pebibyte (1024^5).

Note that the original v0.5.14 version had a compiler error for 32 bit platforms, which has been fixed by v0.5.15.

Methods affected

Only software that uses lzma.NewReader or lzma.ReaderConfig.NewReader is affected. There is no issue for software using the xz functionality.

I thank @​GregoryBuligin for his report, which is provided below.

Summary

When unpacking a large number of LZMA archives, even in a single goroutine, if the first byte of the archive file is 0 (a zero byte added to the beginning), an error writeMatch: distance out of range occurs. Memory consumption spikes sharply, and the GC clearly cannot handle this situation.

Details

Judging by the error writeMatch: distance out of range, the problems occur in the code around this function.
https://github.com/ulikunitz/xz/blob/c8314b8f21e9c5e25b52da07544cac14db277e89/lzma/decoderdict.go#L81

PoC

Run a function similar to this one in 1 or several goroutines on a multitude of LZMA archives that have a 0 (a zero byte) added to the beginning.

const ProjectLocalPath = "some/path"
const TmpDir = "tmp"

func UnpackLZMA(lzmaFile string) error {
	file, err := os.Open(lzmaFile)
	if err != nil {
		return err
	}
	defer file.Close()

	reader, err := lzma.NewReader(bufio.NewReader(file))
	if err != nil {
		return err
	}

	tmpFile, err := os.CreateTemp(TmpDir, TmpLZMAPrefix)
	if err != nil {
		return err
	}
	defer func() {
		tmpFile.Close()
		_ = os.Remove(tmpFile.Name())
	}()

	sha256Hasher := sha256.New()
	multiWriter := io.MultiWriter(tmpFile, sha256Hasher)

	if _, err = io.Copy(multiWriter, reader); err != nil {
		return err
	}

	unpackHash := hex.EncodeToString(sha256Hasher.Sum(nil))
	unpackDir := filepath.Join(
		ProjectLocalPath, unpackHash[:2],
	)
	_ = os.MkdirAll(unpackDir, DirPerm)

	unpackPath := filepath.Join(unpackDir, unpackHash)

	return os.Rename(tmpFile.Name(), unpackPath)
}

Impact

Servers with a small amount of RAM that download and unpack a large number of unverified LZMA archives

---

Release Notes

ulikunitz/xz (github.com/ulikunitz/xz)

v0.5.15

Compare Source

v0.5.14

Compare Source

v0.5.13

Compare Source

v0.5.12

Compare Source

---

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "" (UTC), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

♻ Rebasing: Whenever PR is behind base branch, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.

---

• If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

---

This PR has been generated by Renovate Bot.

[bootc-bot]

Edited/Blocked Notification

Renovate will not automatically rebase this PR, because it does not recognize the last commit author and assumes somebody else may have edited the PR.

You can manually request rebase by checking the rebase/retry box above.

⚠️ Warning: custom changes will be lost.