fix(video-annotations): changing test wording

[bfoxx1906]

Updating test verbiage as a noop change

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Tests
  • Updated test descriptions to use clearer, more precise wording (e.g., replacing ambiguous phrasing with "does not exist") to improve readability and intent for future reviewers.
  • No functional behavior, assertions, or test logic changed; test outcomes remain the same.

_{✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.}

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

Two test descriptions in ContentPreview tests were renamed: "should return if the video player is not found" → "should return if the video player does not exist". No functional code or assertion changes were made.

Changes

Cohort / File(s)	Change Summary
Test Description Updates src/elements/content-preview/__tests__/ContentPreview.test.js	Renamed two test descriptions for clarity; no code, assertion, or behavior changes

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

• No files with logic changes; review can focus on wording only.

Suggested labels

ready-to-merge

Suggested reviewers

• jfox-box
• JChan106

Poem

🐇 A rabbit hops in, tests made bright,
Two lines retold in cleaner light,
No code disturbed, just words made true,
Hooray for clarity — a small thing new! ✨

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

✅ Passed checks (3 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Title check	✅ Passed	The title 'fix(video-annotations): changing test wording' accurately reflects the change: updating test descriptions in ContentPreview.test.js from 'video player is not found' to 'video player does not exist'.
Description check	✅ Passed	The PR description is minimal but adequate for a no-op change, stating 'Updating test verbiage as a noop change'. However, it primarily contains the template instructions rather than substantive context about the changes.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

✨ Finishing touches

• 📝 Generate docstrings

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Post copyable unit tests in a comment

---

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 54101c9 and ee8cdae.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• src/elements/content-preview/__tests__/ContentPreview.test.js (1 hunks)

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (2)

• GitHub Check: lint_test_build
• GitHub Check: Summary

🔇 Additional comments (1)

src/elements/content-preview/__tests__/ContentPreview.test.js (1)

1539-1539: LGTM! Test wording improved for consistency.

The change from "is not found" to "does not exist" makes the test description more consistent with the similar test at line 1435 and is slightly more precise.

Note: The AI summary states that two test descriptions were changed, but only one line (1539) is marked as modified in the provided code. Line 1435 already uses "does not exist" wording and doesn't appear to have been changed in this PR.

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[mergify]

Merge Queue Status

✅ The pull request has been merged at ee8cdae

This pull request spent 5 seconds in the queue, with no time running CI.
The checks were run in-place.

Required conditions to merge

• #approved-reviews-by >= 1 [🛡 GitHub branch protection]
  • fix(video-annotations): changing test wording #4394
• #changes-requested-reviews-by = 0 [🛡 GitHub branch protection]
  • fix(video-annotations): changing test wording #4394
• #review-threads-unresolved = 0 [🛡 GitHub branch protection]
  • fix(video-annotations): changing test wording #4394
• branch-protection-review-decision = APPROVED [🛡 GitHub branch protection]
  • fix(video-annotations): changing test wording #4394
• any of [🛡 GitHub branch protection]:
  • check-success = Summary
  • check-neutral = Summary
  • check-skipped = Summary
• any of [🛡 GitHub branch protection]:
  • check-success = lint_test_build
  • check-neutral = lint_test_build
  • check-skipped = lint_test_build
• any of [🛡 GitHub branch protection]:
  • check-success = license/cla
  • check-neutral = license/cla
  • check-skipped = license/cla
• any of [🛡 GitHub branch protection]:
  • check-success = lint_pull_request
  • check-neutral = lint_pull_request
  • check-skipped = lint_pull_request