Skip to content

Conversation

@Hawra2020
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@Hawra2020 Hawra2020 changed the title feat: Migrate from box-typescript-sdk-gen to box-node-sdk [DRAFT]feat: Migrate from box-typescript-sdk-gen to box-node-sdk Oct 29, 2025
@Hawra2020 Hawra2020 changed the title [DRAFT]feat: Migrate from box-typescript-sdk-gen to box-node-sdk feat: Migrate from box-typescript-sdk-gen to box-node-sdk Oct 29, 2025
@Hawra2020 Hawra2020 changed the title feat: Migrate from box-typescript-sdk-gen to box-node-sdk feat: Migrate from box-typescript-sdk-gen to box-node-sdk Oct 29, 2025
@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Oct 29, 2025

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 18947171442

Details

  • 10 of 10 (100.0%) changed or added relevant lines in 2 files are covered.
  • No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage decreased (-0.02%) to 85.497%

Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 18843031599: -0.02%
Covered Lines: 4602
Relevant Lines: 5189

💛 - Coveralls

@Hawra2020 Hawra2020 force-pushed the sdk-5335-upgrade-to-combined-sdk branch 4 times, most recently from d773bb2 to 47b747b Compare October 29, 2025 19:12
@Hawra2020 Hawra2020 force-pushed the sdk-5335-upgrade-to-combined-sdk branch from 47b747b to 5d4842e Compare October 29, 2025 19:38
@Hawra2020 Hawra2020 changed the title feat: Migrate from box-typescript-sdk-gen to box-node-sdk feat: Migrate to box-node-sdk v4 Oct 30, 2025
@Hawra2020 Hawra2020 changed the title feat: Migrate to box-node-sdk v4 feat: Migrate to box-node-sdk v4 Oct 30, 2025
@congminh1254 congminh1254 changed the title feat: Migrate to box-node-sdk v4 chore: Migrate to box-node-sdk v4 Oct 31, 2025
@congminh1254 congminh1254 merged commit 4f4254d into main Oct 31, 2025
15 checks passed
@congminh1254 congminh1254 deleted the sdk-5335-upgrade-to-combined-sdk branch October 31, 2025 10:58
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants