feat: Add validation check for unique structure acronyms (#666)

[kalpana-pardeep-rassani]

Before submitting a pull request (PR), please read the contributing guide.

Please fill out as much of this template as you can, but if you have any problems or questions, just leave a comment and we will help out :)

Description

What is this PR

• Bug fix
• Addition of a new feature
• Other

Why is this PR needed?

What does this PR do?

References

Please reference any existing issues/PRs that relate to this PR.

How has this PR been tested?

Please explain how any new code has been tested, and how you have ensured that no existing functionality has changed.

Is this a breaking change?

If this PR breaks any existing functionality, please explain how and why.

Does this PR require an update to the documentation?

If any features have changed, or have been added. Please explain how the documentation has been updated (and link to the associated PR). See here for details.

Checklist:

• The code has been tested locally
• Tests have been added to cover all new functionality (unit & integration)
• The documentation has been updated to reflect any changes:|
  I am leaving the documentation update to a follow-up PR or the maintainers.
• The code has been formatted with pre-commit

[adamltyson]

Hi @kalpana-pardeep-rassani, could I ask if you used an LLM to help with this PR? I ask because although some new functionality has been added, lots has also been mistakenly deleted.

[kalpana-pardeep-rassani]

Hi @kalpana-pardeep-rassani, could I ask if you used an LLM to help with this PR? I ask because although some new functionality has been added, lots has also been mistakenly deleted.

apologize for mistaken deletion, i'll keep in my that it won't happen again, I did use an LLM for assistance with some of the structural change, but i'll make sure from now things goes as per your requirements..

[adamltyson]

Hi again @kalpana-pardeep-rassani, are you able to get back to this PR? No worries either way.

Please note now that we have a policy that we will not review submissions that are mostly generated by AI.

[adamltyson]

Hi @kalpana-pardeep-rassani, based on our AI policy, I'm going to close this in favour of #734. If you want to contribute to BrainGlobe in the future, please do get in touch!