Skip to content

Changelog updates for v0.2.0 release#6676

Closed
philrz wants to merge 10 commits intomainfrom
changelog-v0.2.0
Closed

Changelog updates for v0.2.0 release#6676
philrz wants to merge 10 commits intomainfrom
changelog-v0.2.0

Conversation

@philrz
Copy link
Contributor

@philrz philrz commented Feb 27, 2026

philrz and others added 3 commits February 27, 2026 12:55
This commit changes the BSUP version number from 0 to 1 and
expands the version number bits from 0 to 7.  There is currently
no backward compatibility with version 0 and instead an error
will be reported when trying to read old BSUP files.
CHANGELOG.md Outdated
- Upgrade to `github.com/apache/arrow-go/v18@v18.5.1` (#6625)
- Type fusion now ensures fused types never contain unions, have at most one instance of each kind of non-union complex type, and have at most one type with a given type ID (#6651)
- Type decoration for self-describing error values in SUP are now omitted (#6656)
- By default, `super` now reads the first 1000 values when reading from an input file to compute a fused type, and the `-samplesize` flag can be used to adjust this (#6667)
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

"to compute a fused type"
=>
"to infer type information used to type check the query. This can cause type errors when data being reference occurs later in the input."

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

"Type fusion now ensures fused types never contain unions, have at most one instance of each kind of non-union complex type, and have at most one type with a given type ID " (type ID is not user facing)
=>
"Type fusion now ensures any fused unions contain at most one instance of each kind of complex type."

@philrz philrz closed this Feb 27, 2026
@philrz philrz deleted the changelog-v0.2.0 branch February 27, 2026 22:36
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants