Sample tests for tcolorbox sizing#2780
Draft
dginev wants to merge 1 commit intobrucemiller:masterfrom
Draft
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I have not yet completed the "upgrades" PR, but I think I can showcase some tests for tcolorbox sizing.
The one that is particularly useful is
digestion/colorbox_sizes.texas it targets lower level constructs. And it's hand-written.That said, the tcolorbox test directory consists fully of extractions from arXiv articles where users have reported bad sizing for
{tcolorbox}. As it turns out, the colored backgrounds prove a very potent proving ground for the sizing of the full variety of LaTeX constructs.[Aside: I find it reminiscent of the red/green setup for Web Platform Tests]
Naturally, this is a draft PR. And may be superseded - mostly a discussion marker.