Skip to content

Conversation

@ivicac
Copy link
Contributor

@ivicac ivicac commented Jan 22, 2025

  • - runtime application
  • e
  • 1023 - client - Don’t use files from automation namespace in the workflow editor
  • 1023 - client - Fix react query keys
  • 1023 - client - Define separate mutaion for the workflow editor to decrease number of queries during refresh

@gitguardian
Copy link

gitguardian bot commented Jan 22, 2025

⚠️ GitGuardian has uncovered 2 secrets following the scan of your pull request.

Please consider investigating the findings and remediating the incidents. Failure to do so may lead to compromising the associated services or software components.

🔎 Detected hardcoded secrets in your pull request
GitGuardian id GitGuardian status Secret Commit Filename
13973369 Triggered Generic Password 0bb7d33 server/ee/apps/runtime-app/src/main/resources/config/application-dev.yml View secret
13982936 Triggered Generic High Entropy Secret 0bb7d33 server/ee/apps/runtime-app/src/main/resources/config/application-prod.yml View secret
🛠 Guidelines to remediate hardcoded secrets
  1. Understand the implications of revoking this secret by investigating where it is used in your code.
  2. Replace and store your secrets safely. Learn here the best practices.
  3. Revoke and rotate these secrets.
  4. If possible, rewrite git history. Rewriting git history is not a trivial act. You might completely break other contributing developers' workflow and you risk accidentally deleting legitimate data.

To avoid such incidents in the future consider


🦉 GitGuardian detects secrets in your source code to help developers and security teams secure the modern development process. You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized GitGuardian to scan your pull request.

@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

Quality Gate Failed Quality Gate failed for 'client'

Failed conditions
21.1% Coverage on New Code (required ≥ 80%)
4.3% Duplication on New Code (required ≤ 3%)

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud

@ivicac ivicac changed the title poc 1 embedded 520 small fixes Jan 22, 2025
@ivicac ivicac closed this Jan 22, 2025
@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

@ivicac ivicac deleted the poc_1-embedded_520 branch March 10, 2025 20:52
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants