Skip to content

Conversation

mandyschen
Copy link
Contributor

What changed?
Removed uses of buildkite and used github actions instead.

Why?
We want to migrate away from using buildkite.

How did you test it?
I test using the Github Actions functionality in the UI.

Potential risks
Doesn't catch certain failures, flaky tests

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 28, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 82.13%. Comparing base (2af19f2) to head (1716229).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on master.
see 2 files with indirect coverage changes


Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 2af19f2...1716229. Read the comment docs.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@mandyschen
Copy link
Contributor Author

GRPC buildkite:
image
GRPC GA:
image

Sticky on buildkite:
image
Sticky on GA:
image

Sticky off buildkite:
image
Sticky off GA:
image

Unit test buildkite:
image
Unit test GA:
image

GA Artifacts:
image
Unit test has multiple:
image

@mandyschen mandyschen marked this pull request as ready for review July 28, 2025 23:28
@mandyschen mandyschen merged commit 59410c7 into master Jul 29, 2025
21 of 22 checks passed
@mandyschen mandyschen deleted the mandychen/github-actions-to-buildkite branch July 29, 2025 15:52
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants