Skip to content

ci: Use release-please for release creation #7279

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
+48 −0
Open

ci: Use release-please for release creation #7279

Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit Hold shift + click to select a range
b806889
ci: Use release-please for release creation
c-warren Sep 26, 2025
e3dbe5f
Update configuration to conform to existing release tag tagging system
c-warren Sep 30, 2025
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
18 changes: 18 additions & 0 deletions .github/workflows/release-please.yml
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
name: Release Please

on:
push:
branches:
- master

permissions:
contents: write
pull-requests: write

jobs:
release-please:
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
steps:
- uses: googleapis/release-please-action@v4
with:
config-file: .release-please-config.json
28 changes: 28 additions & 0 deletions .release-please-config.json
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,28 @@
{
"release-type": "go",
"prerelease": true,
"prerelease-type": "rc",
"bump-minor-pre-major": true,
"bump-patch-for-minor-pre-major": true,
"packages": {
".": {
"package-name": "cadence",
"release-type": "go",
"bump-minor-pre-major": true,
"bump-patch-for-minor-pre-major": true,
"versioning": "default"
}
},
"changelog-sections": [
{"type": "feat", "section": "Features"},
{"type": "fix", "section": "Bug Fixes"},
{"type": "perf", "section": "Performance Improvements"},
{"type": "revert", "section": "Reverts"},
{"type": "docs", "section": "Documentation"},
{"type": "style", "section": "Styles"},
{"type": "refactor", "section": "Code Refactoring"},
{"type": "test", "section": "Tests"},
{"type": "build", "section": "Build System"},
{"type": "ci", "section": "Continuous Integration"}
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nit: I'd maybe just keep feat/fix/perf, I don't know if these other ones add a lot of value

]
}
Loading