Skip to content

feat(26.04): cargo-1.88 slices#834

Open
lczyk wants to merge 5 commits intocanonical:ubuntu-26.04from
lczyk:ROCKS-2271/cargo-1.88-26.04
Open

feat(26.04): cargo-1.88 slices#834
lczyk wants to merge 5 commits intocanonical:ubuntu-26.04from
lczyk:ROCKS-2271/cargo-1.88-26.04

Conversation

@lczyk
Copy link
Collaborator

@lczyk lczyk commented Jan 14, 2026

Proposed changes

slices for cargo-1.88

this is the default cargo for 26.04

Related issues/PRs

this PR is part of the following stack:

Forward porting

the default rust versions for each of the current versions of Ubuntu are:

ubuntu rustc gcc
24.04 1.75 13
25.04 1.84 14
25.10 1.85 15
26.04 1.88 15

1.75:

1.84:

1.85:

1.88:

Checklist

🦀

@lczyk
Copy link
Collaborator Author

lczyk commented Jan 14, 2026

@ROCKsBot ROCKsBot requested a review from a team January 15, 2026 01:37
@lczyk lczyk mentioned this pull request Jan 15, 2026
3 tasks
@lczyk lczyk removed the Blocked Waiting for something external label Feb 2, 2026
@lczyk lczyk force-pushed the ROCKS-2271/cargo-1.88-26.04 branch from d5f368a to 127ce37 Compare February 2, 2026 15:04
@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Feb 9, 2026

Test Coverage

Average Total Coverage: 37.50%


Arch: aarch64

Coverage: 37.50%

cargo: 🌂 0.00% (4 missing)
cargo_cargo
cargo_copyright
cargo_headers
cargo_libs
cargo-1.88: 🌂 50.00% (2 missing)
cargo-1.88_headers
cargo-1.88_libs
libgit2-1.9: 🌂 50.00% (2 missing)
libgit2-1.9_cargo
libgit2-1.9_headers
libpam0g-dev: 🌂 50.00% (2 missing)
libpam0g-dev_cargo
libpam0g-dev_headers

Arch: x86_64

Coverage: 37.50%

cargo: 🌂 0.00% (4 missing)
cargo_cargo
cargo_copyright
cargo_headers
cargo_libs
cargo-1.88: 🌂 50.00% (2 missing)
cargo-1.88_headers
cargo-1.88_libs
libgit2-1.9: 🌂 50.00% (2 missing)
libgit2-1.9_cargo
libgit2-1.9_headers
libpam0g-dev: 🌂 50.00% (2 missing)
libpam0g-dev_cargo
libpam0g-dev_headers

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant