Skip to content

feat(25.10): arch-dependent gcc slices#896

Open
lczyk wants to merge 2 commits intocanonical:ubuntu-25.10from
lczyk:gcc-arch-for-25.10
Open

feat(25.10): arch-dependent gcc slices#896
lczyk wants to merge 2 commits intocanonical:ubuntu-25.10from
lczyk:gcc-arch-for-25.10

Conversation

@lczyk
Copy link
Collaborator

@lczyk lczyk commented Feb 5, 2026

Proposed changes

slices for gcc-aarch64-linux-gnu and gcc-x86-64-linux-gnu. they just contain the symlinks to gcc-15 but some things rely on those symlinks.

all the tests are identical to the gcc-15-$arch tests, with -15 removed.

cpp-$arch is also sliced since the deb depends on it for copyright.

this is a trivial backport of #836

this backport goes as far as it can. the pattern for packaging gcc on jammy is different.

Related issues/PRs

Forward porting

Checklist

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Feb 5, 2026

Test Coverage

Average Total Coverage: 75.00%


Arch: aarch64

Coverage: 75.00%

cpp-aarch64-linux-gnu: 🌂 50.00% (1 missing)
cpp-aarch64-linux-gnu_gcc
cpp-x86-64-linux-gnu: 🌂 50.00% (1 missing)
cpp-x86-64-linux-gnu_gcc
gcc-aarch64-linux-gnu: ☂️ 100.00% (0 missing)
gcc-x86-64-linux-gnu: ☂️ 100.00% (0 missing)

Arch: x86_64

Coverage: 75.00%

cpp-aarch64-linux-gnu: 🌂 50.00% (1 missing)
cpp-aarch64-linux-gnu_gcc
cpp-x86-64-linux-gnu: 🌂 50.00% (1 missing)
cpp-x86-64-linux-gnu_gcc
gcc-aarch64-linux-gnu: ☂️ 100.00% (0 missing)
gcc-x86-64-linux-gnu: ☂️ 100.00% (0 missing)

@lczyk
Copy link
Collaborator Author

lczyk commented Feb 5, 2026

git dc lczyk/gcc-arch-for-25.10 lczyk/gcc-arch-for-26.04 -- slices/cpp-*.yaml slices/gcc-*.yaml tests/spread/integration/gcc-*/**/* shows no diff

@ROCKsBot ROCKsBot requested a review from a team February 6, 2026 01:39
Copy link
Collaborator

@zhijie-yang zhijie-yang left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Confirmed that 25.10's gcc also depends on and links to the bins from gcc-15.

@ROCKsBot ROCKsBot requested a review from a team February 7, 2026 01:38
@lczyk lczyk requested a review from a team February 11, 2026 14:16
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants