-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 207
Server sdo block upload (based on v2.3.0) #559
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
H-Grobben
wants to merge
9
commits into
canopen-python:master
Choose a base branch
from
AEMICS:server_sdo_block_v2.3.0
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
9 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
24c9ac1
Busy with block in server, upload block now working, but w.i.p.
H-Grobben 5b50882
add Abort handling during block upload
H-Grobben c341b8d
print statement adjusted
H-Grobben 6d3ed09
formatter from VSCode does something wrong..
H-Grobben 58778b4
Fixed formatter from VSCode.
H-Grobben 5dc6b25
Merge branch 'master' into server_sdo_block_v2.3.0
H-Grobben 9908fa7
revert black formatting in test_sdo
H-Grobben 1131c8d
review from github: suggested changes / formatting
H-Grobben 5ef4771
Requests by reviewer: bugfixes
H-Grobben File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
In contrast to the others, this is not a
struct.Struct
object, why?And it seems to be unused.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
To be honnest: I wrote this code some years ago, made it work for our application, and stumbled across it missing in my new PC (unittests on code not running anymore).
So I made a PR with that old code fitted into release 2.3.0. So I can only guess what was in my mind then.
The reason for putting it in a contained class is that the block transfer has some running states to keep (as the command byte does not adhere to normal SDO transfers for expedited or segmented). I did some more sniffer and test code back then and this is a result of all the combined work (it works with the CanOpenNode C firmware on several microprocessor brands).
And: yes we would test it, but I don't know in what timeframe that would be, as this piece of code does the job for us. But getting block transfers into the main branch would be beneficial if I or any of my colleagues would again forget to install our canopen lib and install the public code base.