[localserver] support for deviceId field in messages#238
Conversation
|
""" WalkthroughThe changes update device ID handling in the local server module. Device IDs are now sourced directly from settings instead of being computed. Message request and response data classes are extended to include device ID fields. Message route handlers validate incoming device IDs and include the device ID in responses. The API specification is updated to reflect these changes with new deviceId properties and an optional query parameter. Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant Client
participant MessagesRoutes
participant LocalServerSettings
participant MessageService
Client->>MessagesRoutes: POST /messages (with deviceId)
MessagesRoutes->>LocalServerSettings: Get deviceId
MessagesRoutes->>MessagesRoutes: Validate request.deviceId == settings.deviceId
alt Invalid deviceId
MessagesRoutes-->>Client: 400 Bad Request ("Invalid device ID")
else Valid deviceId
MessagesRoutes->>MessageService: Create message
MessageService-->>MessagesRoutes: Message object
MessagesRoutes-->>Client: PostMessageResponse (includes deviceId)
end
Possibly related PRs
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (6)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (5)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (1)
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
docs/api/swagger.json (1)
1155-1162: Consider tightening thedeviceIddefinition
deviceIdis declared as an arbitrary nullable string, but every other occurrence in the spec uses a 21-char base-62 identifier (see examples at lines 736 and 1299). Adding a pattern constraint keeps clients & server validation aligned and prevents silent truncation / mismatch."deviceId": { "type": "string", "nullable": true, - "description": "Optional device ID for explicit selection", + "description": "Optional device ID for explicit selection.", + "pattern": "^[A-Za-z0-9]{21}$", "maxLength": 21, "example": "PyDmBQZZXYmyxMwED8Fzy" }
65193aa to
ac0a0b2
Compare
ac0a0b2 to
5b3b6a4
Compare
🤖 Pull request artifacts
|
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes