[WIP] Extend M680X support to HCS12X#2898
Draft
historicattle wants to merge 1 commit intocapstone-engine:nextfrom
Draft
[WIP] Extend M680X support to HCS12X#2898historicattle wants to merge 1 commit intocapstone-engine:nextfrom
historicattle wants to merge 1 commit intocapstone-engine:nextfrom
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Naren Sirigere <sirigere.naren@gmail.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Your checklist for this pull request
Detailed description
This extends support of the M680X architecture to include HCS12X
HCS12X is upwards compatible with CPU12
Reference (No link since it requires logging into nxp)
todo:
Test plan
The tests don't work as of yet since the prefix of the overlay table (0x18), is recognized as an illegal instruction as per the CPU12 table, leading it to believe it as 2 instr instead of 1
Closing issues
none