Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
| <Endnote label='Credits' divider> | ||
|
|
||
| Matt, Mengyang, and Mike designed the numerical experiments. Mengyang performed the model simulations to generate the underlying data. Alicia conceived the idea to serve these data as a community dataset. Tom generated the dataset underlying the online tool and some of the explainer figures. Matt, Alicia, Freya, Kata, and Shane designed the figures; Kata and Shane produced the figures. Elizabeth and Tom produced the IRF convolution example. Matt and Freya wrote the article. All authors contributed to revising the text. Header image (modified) by [Koen Emmers](https://unsplash.com/photos/water-drop-on-body-of-water-Da1Wv-XC43k) on [Unsplash](https://unsplash.com/). | ||
| Matt, Mengyang, and Mike designed the numerical experiments. Mengyang performed the model simulations to generate the underlying data. Alicia conceived the idea to serve these data as a community dataset. Tom generated the dataset underlying the online tool and some of the explainer figures. Matt, Alicia, Freya, Kata, and Shane designed the figures; Kata and Shane produced the figures. Elizabeth and Tom produced the IRF convolution example. Matt and Freya wrote the article. All authors contributed to revising the text. Header image (modified) by [Koen Emmers](https://unsplash.com/photos/water-drop-on-body-of-water-Da1Wv-XC43k) on [Unsplash](https://unsplash.com/). This research used resources of the National Energy Research Scientific Computing Center (NERSC), a Department of Energy Office of Science User Facility using NERSC award ALCC-ERCAP0034226. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Hmm it seems like this might be more appropriate at the end of the Terms section -- wdyt?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
yeah the sections feel kinda weird to me. I think everything that's currently in terms except "The article text and figures are made available under a CC BY 4.0 International license" probably belongs in credits, including this addition?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Ah well if you look back at our explainers, we quite consistently use Terms for funding information and use Credits to describe individual contributions + give citation guidance. So I think just moving the NERSC acknowledgment to Terms would be consistent with our pattern.
2 participants
No description provided.