CIP-0172? | Self-Usable Transaction Outputs

CIP-0172/README.md

@@ -0,0 +1,123 @@
+---
+CIP: 172
+Title: Self-Usable Transaction Outputs
+Status: Proposed
+Category: Ledger
+Authors:
+    - Carlos Tomé Cortiñas <carlos.tome-cortinas@iohk.io>
+Implementors:
+Discussions:
+Created: 2026-01-15
+License: CC-BY-4.0
+---
+
+## Abstract
+
+We propose to allow transactions to reference scripts and data present on their
+own outputs during validation.
+
+## Motivation: Why is this CIP necessary?
+
+Transaction outputs carry scripts (via reference scripts) and/or data (via
+inline datum). However, the Cardano Ledger currently enforces a restriction
+that prevents a transaction from satisfying its validation requirements using
+scripts and data contained within its own outputs.
+
+This restriction creates a specific inefficiency: if a transaction produces an
+output containing a script or datum that is also required to validate that same
+transaction, the transaction cannot utilize the copy present in the output.
+Instead, the transaction must provide a redundant copy of the same script or
+data (e.g., in the transaction witnesses). This forced redundancy increases
+transaction size, and thus transaction fees, directly inflating the costs
+incurred by users.
+
+In combination with the upcoming feature of [nested transactions](https://github.com/cardano-foundation/CIPs/blob/master/CIP-0118/README.md), in the
+Dijkstra era, the current restriction imposes a strict constraint in how
+scripts and/or data can be shared within a batch. Specifically, without this
+proposal, scripts and/or data produced in transaction outputs are only
+accessible to subsequent sub-transactions (via reference inputs). This forces
+transaction builders to artificially order transactions or to provide redundant
+copies of the same script or data (e.g., if two sub-transactions mutually
+depend on each other's script and/or data).
+
+The key idea of this CIP is to remove this restriction, allowing transactions
+to reference their own outputs for validation purposes.
+
+### Use cases
+
+#### Combine publishing reference scripts with first usage
+
+Currently deploying stateful dApps on Cardano requires a multi-transaction
+workflow:
+- First transaction: Deploy the dApp's script as a reference script in the
+  UTxO.
+- Second transaction: Reference this script (via reference inputs) to mint
+  state tokens.
+
+(Note that this can be achieved swapping the order of transactions. However, it
+still requires two transactions)
+
+With the proposed changes, such applications could be deployed in a single
+transaction, which simultaneously deploys the reference script UTxO's and mints
+the state token. This eliminates the need for submitting multiple transactions,
+thereby reducing costs, while at the same time improving the developer's
+experience.
+
+#### Nested transactions: order-agnostic script sharing across a batch
+
+The nested transactions CIP specifies that scripts are to be shared among all
+sub- and top-level transactions within a batch (see [CIP-0118 > Changes to Transaction
+Validity](https://github.com/carlostome/CIPs/tree/master/CIP-0118#changes-to-transaction-validity)).
+
+With the current restriction, this requirement can only be partially achieved
+by sharing scripts either (1) from transaction witnesses or (2) via reference
+inputs that point to outputs of sub-transactions in the same batch which have
+already been applied to the UTxO state.
+
+With the proposed change in this CIP, the requirement can be achieved allowing
+scripts to be shared directly from transaction outputs, regardless of which
+sub- or top-level transaction they appear in. This eliminates the dependency on
+processing order and enables more flexible script sharing within the batch.
+
+## Specification
+
+There is an [Agda
+specification](https://github.com/IntersectMBO/formal-ledger-specifications/tree/carlos/usable-outputs)
+prototype of the proposed changes (for Conway).
+
+### Changes to the Ledger logic
+
+- The function `txscripts` needs to be modified to include scripts from `txouts`.
+- The function `getDatum` needs to be modified to include data from `txouts`.
+
+## Rationale: How does this CIP achieve its goals?
+
+The current ledger logic prohibits transactions from accessing their own
+outputs during validation. However, this restriction comes at the cost of
+redundancy when the same script or datum serves dual purposes: being included
+in an output for future use and being required for current validation.
+
+This CIP achieves its goal by relaxing this restriction so that validation may
+reference scripts and data committed in the transaction body’s outputs, which
+removes the need to carry duplicate copies in witnesses and reduces transaction
+size and fees.
+
+### Backward compatibility
+
+The changes proposed in this CIP break backward compatibility of Plutus scripts
+whose logic depends on the script being part of the outputs of the transaction
+being validated.
+
+## Path to Active
+
+### Acceptance Criteria
+
+- Fully implemented in Cardano node
+
+### Implementation Plan
+
+- TODO
+
+## Copyright
+
+This CIP is licensed under [CC-BY-4.0](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode).