Skip to content

Conversation

@mergify
Copy link
Contributor

@mergify mergify bot commented Jan 29, 2026

🎉 This pull request has been checked successfully and will be merged soon. 🎉

Branch release-v3.16 (57cd925) and #5980 are embarked together for merge.

This pull request has been created by Mergify to speculatively check the mergeability of #5980.
You don't need to do anything. Mergify will close this pull request automatically when it is complete.

Required conditions of queue default for merge:

  • #approved-reviews-by >= 1 [🛡 GitHub branch protection]
  • #changes-requested-reviews-by = 0 [🛡 GitHub branch protection]
  • any of:
    • all of:
      • base~=^(release-.+)$
      • status-success=codespell
      • status-success=go-test
      • status-success=golangci-lint
      • status-success=lint-extras
      • status-success=mod-check
      • status-success=multi-arch-build
      • status-success=uncommitted-code-check
      • any of:
        • all of:
          • status-success=ci/centos/k8s-e2e-external-storage/1.32
          • status-success=ci/centos/k8s-e2e-external-storage/1.33
          • status-success=ci/centos/k8s-e2e-external-storage/1.34
          • status-success=ci/centos/mini-e2e-helm/k8s-1.32
          • status-success=ci/centos/mini-e2e-helm/k8s-1.33
          • status-success=ci/centos/mini-e2e-helm/k8s-1.34
          • status-success=ci/centos/mini-e2e/k8s-1.32
          • status-success=ci/centos/mini-e2e/k8s-1.33
          • status-success=ci/centos/mini-e2e/k8s-1.34
          • status-success=ci/centos/upgrade-tests-cephfs
          • status-success=ci/centos/upgrade-tests-rbd
        • label=ci/skip/e2e
    • all of:
      • base=release-v3.15
      • any of:
        • label=ci/skip/e2e
        • all of:
          • status-success=ci/centos/k8s-e2e-external-storage/1.31
          • status-success=ci/centos/mini-e2e-helm/k8s-1.31
          • status-success=ci/centos/mini-e2e/k8s-1.31
          • status-success=ci/centos/k8s-e2e-external-storage/1.32
          • status-success=ci/centos/k8s-e2e-external-storage/1.33
          • status-success=ci/centos/mini-e2e-helm/k8s-1.32
          • status-success=ci/centos/mini-e2e-helm/k8s-1.33
          • status-success=ci/centos/mini-e2e/k8s-1.32
          • status-success=ci/centos/mini-e2e/k8s-1.33
          • status-success=ci/centos/upgrade-tests-cephfs
          • status-success=ci/centos/upgrade-tests-rbd
      • status-success=codespell
      • status-success=go-test
      • status-success=golangci-lint
      • status-success=lint-extras
      • status-success=mod-check
      • status-success=multi-arch-build
      • status-success=uncommitted-code-check
    • all of:
      • base=devel
      • status-success=codespell
      • status-success=go-test
      • status-success=golangci-lint
      • status-success=lint-extras
      • status-success=mod-check
      • status-success=multi-arch-build
      • status-success=uncommitted-code-check
      • any of:
        • all of:
          • status-success=ci/centos/k8s-e2e-external-storage/1.32
          • status-success=ci/centos/k8s-e2e-external-storage/1.33
          • status-success=ci/centos/k8s-e2e-external-storage/1.34
          • status-success=ci/centos/mini-e2e-helm/k8s-1.32
          • status-success=ci/centos/mini-e2e-helm/k8s-1.33
          • status-success=ci/centos/mini-e2e-helm/k8s-1.34
          • status-success=ci/centos/mini-e2e/k8s-1.32
          • status-success=ci/centos/mini-e2e/k8s-1.33
          • status-success=ci/centos/mini-e2e/k8s-1.34
          • status-success=ci/centos/upgrade-tests-cephfs
          • status-success=ci/centos/upgrade-tests-rbd
        • label=ci/skip/e2e
    • all of:
      • base=ci/centos
      • status-success=ci/centos/jjb-validate
      • status-success=ci/centos/job-validation

Required conditions to stay in the queue:

---
checking_base_sha: 57cd925407e9bd4f0b374f406a5a0eaf0cebaa90
previous_failed_batches: []
pull_requests:
  - number: 5980
...

nixpanic and others added 2 commits January 27, 2026 15:38
It seems that in some scenarios the `kubectl replace` command fails
because the ConfigMap does not exist (yet?). By checking for the
existance of the ConfigMap, and running either `create` or `replace`,
this spurious issue should not happen anymore.

Signed-off-by: Niels de Vos <[email protected]>
(cherry picked from commit cba25cb)
@ceph-csi-bot ceph-csi-bot added component/testing Additional test cases or CI work ci/skip/multi-arch-build skip building on multiple architectures queued dequeued ok-to-test Label to trigger E2E tests labels Jan 29, 2026
@ceph-csi-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

/test ci/centos/k8s-e2e-external-storage/1.33

@ceph-csi-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

/test ci/centos/k8s-e2e-external-storage/1.34

@ceph-csi-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

/test ci/centos/upgrade-tests-cephfs

@ceph-csi-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

/test ci/centos/mini-e2e-helm/k8s-1.33

@ceph-csi-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

/test ci/centos/k8s-e2e-external-storage/1.32

@ceph-csi-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

/test ci/centos/upgrade-tests-rbd

@ceph-csi-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

/test ci/centos/mini-e2e-helm/k8s-1.34

@ceph-csi-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

/test ci/centos/mini-e2e/k8s-1.33

@ceph-csi-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

/test ci/centos/mini-e2e-helm/k8s-1.32

@ceph-csi-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

/test ci/centos/mini-e2e/k8s-1.34

@ceph-csi-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

/test ci/centos/mini-e2e/k8s-1.32

@ceph-csi-bot ceph-csi-bot removed the ok-to-test Label to trigger E2E tests label Jan 29, 2026
@mergify mergify bot closed this Jan 29, 2026
@mergify mergify bot deleted the mergify/merge-queue/411bc12f2c branch January 29, 2026 19:18
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

ci/skip/multi-arch-build skip building on multiple architectures component/testing Additional test cases or CI work dequeued queued

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants