feat: added lit examples... again

[gperdomor]

Closes #

📝 Description

This PR add Lit examples

⛳️ Current behavior (updates)

There is not Lit examples provided

🚀 New behavior

Adds a POC of using zag with Lit

💣 Is this a breaking change (Yes/No):

No

📝 Additional Information

[changeset-bot]

⚠️ No Changeset found

Latest commit: f59e563

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

This PR includes no changesets

When changesets are added to this PR, you'll see the packages that this PR includes changesets for and the associated semver types

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

[vercel]

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project	Deployment	Preview	Updated (UTC)
zag-nextjs	Ready	Preview	Sep 3, 2025 2:32pm
zag-solid	Ready	Preview	Sep 3, 2025 2:32pm
zag-svelte	Ready	Preview	Sep 3, 2025 2:32pm
zag-vue	Ready	Preview	Sep 3, 2025 2:32pm
zag-website	Ready	Preview	Sep 3, 2025 2:32pm

[manuelserradev]

Sorry to interrupt — outsider here 👋

I noticed some back-and-forth on this PR regarding the Lit example. Just a thought: aligning the Lit utilities with the semantics used in other frameworks might help ease the merge.

For instance, proxying new VanillaMachine(...props) to a hook-like API such as useMachine(...props) could bring the Lit example closer to the official ones. That might even pave the way for Lit to become officially supported, especially if a few champions step up.

This could also broaden Zag's scope as a Swiss Army knife for building highly accessible, cross-framework design systems.

Disclaimer: apologies if any of this is off-base — I'm not an expert in Lit or Zag, just sharing an outside perspective.