[7.111.x] Fix critical CVE in form-data package (GHSA-fjxv-7rqg-78g4) #591
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…bator#589) * Fix critical CVE in form-data package (GHSA-fjxv-7rqg-78g4) Updated form-data across multiple packages to address critical security vulnerability where unsafe random function was used for choosing boundary values. Vulnerability Details: - Advisory: GHSA-fjxv-7rqg-78g4 - Severity: Critical - CWE-330: Use of Insufficiently Random Values - Affected versions: <2.5.4, 3.0.0-3.0.3, 4.0.0-4.0.3 Packages Updated: - code/package-lock.json - code/extensions/che-activity-tracker/package-lock.json - code/extensions/che-api/package-lock.json - code/extensions/che-commands/package-lock.json - code/extensions/che-port/package-lock.json - code/extensions/che-remote/package-lock.json The form-data package is used as a transitive dependency through: - @types/node-fetch - axios - jsdom Verification: npm audit confirms the critical form-data vulnerability has been resolved. Vulnerability count reduced from 14 to 13. Generated-by: Claude CLI 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) Co-Authored-By: Claude <[email protected]> * Fix critical CVE in form-data package (GHSA-fjxv-7rqg-78g4) Signed-off-by: Stephane Bouchet <[email protected]> * Fix critical CVE in form-data package (GHSA-fjxv-7rqg-78g4) Signed-off-by: Stephane Bouchet <[email protected]> * Fix critical CVE in form-data package (GHSA-fjxv-7rqg-78g4) Signed-off-by: Stephane Bouchet <[email protected]> * Fix critical CVE in form-data package (GHSA-fjxv-7rqg-78g4) Signed-off-by: Stephane Bouchet <[email protected]> * Fix critical CVE in form-data package (GHSA-fjxv-7rqg-78g4) Signed-off-by: Stephane Bouchet <[email protected]> * update che devworkspace-generator version Signed-off-by: Stephane Bouchet <[email protected]> --------- Signed-off-by: Stephane Bouchet <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Claude <[email protected]>
sbouchet
requested review from
RomanNikitenko,
azatsarynnyy and
vitaliy-guliy
as code owners
|
Click here to review and test in web IDE: |
&message=Dev%20cluster%20(for%20maintainers)&logo=eclipseche&color=525C86&labelColor=FDB940)
sbouchet
changed the title
|
Pull Request images published ✨ Editor amd64: quay.io/che-incubator-pull-requests/che-code:pr-591-amd64 |
RomanNikitenko
approved these changes
Nov 5, 2025
Collaborator
|
@SkorikSergey |
SkorikSergey
approved these changes
Nov 6, 2025
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Updated form-data across multiple packages to address critical security vulnerability where unsafe random function was used for choosing boundary
values.
Vulnerability Details:
Packages Updated:
The form-data package is used as a transitive dependency through:
Verification: npm audit confirms the critical form-data vulnerability has been resolved. Vulnerability count reduced from 14 to 13.
Generated-by: Claude CLI
🤖 Generated with Claude Code
What does this PR do?
backport of #589
What issues does this PR fix?
How to test this PR?
Does this PR contain changes that override default upstream Code-OSS behavior?
git rebasewere added to the .rebase folder