Skip to content

Conversation

@armando-rodriguez-cko
Copy link
Contributor

Add Missing Document Types

Description:

This PR introduces support for additional document types in the Checkout.com SDK, improving coverage for specific compliance and verification scenarios.


Key Changes:

Documents.cs

  • Added two new document properties for EEA Sole Trader (3.0) representatives:
    • ProofOfResidentialAddress
    • ProofOfRegistration

ProofOfRegistration.cs

  • Added a new document class:
    • Properties:
      • Type: Specifies the type of proof (e.g., trade register extract).
      • Front: Stores the document data.

ProofOfRegistrationType.cs

  • Defined an enum for ProofOfRegistration types:
    • ExtractFromTradeRegister
    • Other

ProofOfResidentialAddress.cs

  • Added a new document class:
    • Properties:
      • Type: Specifies the type of residential address proof.
      • Front: Stores the document data.

ProofOfResidentialAddressType.cs

  • Defined an enum for ProofOfResidentialAddress types:
    • ProofOfAddress

Impact:

  • Improved Compliance: Supports additional document types required for EEA Sole Trader verifications.
  • Expanded Use Cases: Enables better handling of regional and compliance-specific document verification workflows.

Additional Notes:

  • These changes align with the latest compliance updates for EEA verification.
  • The new fields and enums are backward compatible and optional.

@armando-rodriguez-cko armando-rodriguez-cko requested a review from a team January 10, 2025 10:28
@armando-rodriguez-cko armando-rodriguez-cko force-pushed the feature/add-missing-document-types-in-representative-company-eea-sole-trader-3.0 branch from d016e39 to 3fbb571 Compare January 10, 2025 13:46
@armando-rodriguez-cko armando-rodriguez-cko merged commit 811519c into master Jan 15, 2025
5 checks passed
@armando-rodriguez-cko armando-rodriguez-cko deleted the feature/add-missing-document-types-in-representative-company-eea-sole-trader-3.0 branch January 15, 2025 09:12
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants