Conversation
This will be relevant to Caliptra SS implementers and I could not find a mention of this elsewhere here.
|
@bharatpillilli I think we should replicate the Caliptra sybsystem compliance text into the main trademark audit process doc. Can you do that? If not I can |
|
What's captured at https://github.com/chipsalliance/Caliptra/blob/main/doc/Caliptra.md#caliptra-subsystem-trademark-compliance lacks detail around subsystem integration requirements and does not describe which of the existing Caliptra-Core requirements are met by subsystem. The current checklist is specific to Caliptra-Core v1.x. Updates are going to be needed for both Core v2.0 and Subsystem. I agree that the trademark compliance section should be moved though. My suggestion would be to create a parallel requirements checklist doc for subsystem and use this as the starting point for a 0.1 draft. That doc could then be linked in the policy doc (with appropriate disclaimers regarding it being work-in-progress). |
|
Ok Once we get subsystem in place we will rev the tm policy to 2.0 |
This will be relevant to Caliptra SS implementers and I could not find a mention of this elsewhere here.