Skip to content

Improve README#221

Open
christianhelle wants to merge 4 commits intomasterfrom
readme
Open

Improve README#221
christianhelle wants to merge 4 commits intomasterfrom
readme

Conversation

@christianhelle
Copy link
Owner

@christianhelle christianhelle commented Oct 15, 2025

Improve the README.md by adding comprehensive installation instructions, a getting started guide, configuration options, supported scenarios, limitations, troubleshooting tips, and contributing guidelines. This update aims to provide clearer guidance for users and contributors.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Expanded README with Introduction, Getting Started, Configuration (custom namespace, tool selection), Supported Scenarios, How It Works, Troubleshooting, Contributing, License, and Links.
    • Added step-by-step examples and updated C# and VB code samples, plus screenshot references.
    • Improved formatting and section headers for clearer navigation.
    • No functional or public API changes.

Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings October 15, 2025 08:24
Copy link

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull Request Overview

This PR significantly improves the README.md documentation by adding comprehensive guidance for users and contributors. The update transforms a basic feature description into a complete user guide with installation instructions, configuration options, troubleshooting tips, and contribution guidelines.

Key changes:

  • Added detailed installation and getting started sections for new users
  • Included configuration options and supported scenarios with limitations
  • Enhanced existing content with better formatting and additional context sections

End If
End Sub
End Class

Copy link

Copilot AI Oct 15, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The empty line at the end of the code block should be removed to maintain consistent formatting.

Suggested change

Copilot uses AI. Check for mistakes.
@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 15, 2025

Note

Other AI code review bot(s) detected

CodeRabbit has detected other AI code review bot(s) in this pull request and will avoid duplicating their findings in the review comments. This may lead to a less comprehensive review.

Walkthrough

Expanded README.md with detailed sections, examples (C# and VB), screenshots references, and guidance. No code or API changes.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Documentation
README.md
Major content expansion: Introduction, Getting Started, Configuration (custom namespace/tool selection), Supported Scenarios, How It Works, Troubleshooting, Contributing, License, links, multiple example usage/code blocks (C# and VB), and screenshot references. No functional/public API changes.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes

Poem

In README fields I hop with cheer,
New sections bloom—so clear, sincere.
C# and VB trails to tread,
Screenshots dance where docs have spread.
No code to tweak, no APIs stirred—
Just carrots of clarity, finely conferred. 🥕

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title Check ✅ Passed The title “Improve README” accurately reflects that the pull request’s primary focus is enhancing and expanding the README documentation and aligns directly with the changes made. It is concise, clear, and immediately conveys the main intent of the update.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changes. Docstring coverage check skipped.
✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch readme

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Caution

Some comments are outside the diff and can’t be posted inline due to platform limitations.

⚠️ Outside diff range comments (2)
README.md (2)

126-257: Redact personal/machine info in generated code examples
Replace embedded “Computer Name” and “User Name” with placeholders (e.g., MACHINE_NAME, USER_NAME), standardize timestamps to ISO 8601 (e.g., 2025-04-29T23:49:45Z), and add a note that these fields are optional or configurable in the generator.


260-370: Redact PII in VB code sample and document metadata toggle

  • Replace the concrete timestamp, computer name and user name in the VB snippet (README.md lines 283–288) with placeholders (e.g. <TIMESTAMP>, <COMPUTER_NAME>, <USER_NAME>).
  • Add a note stating whether these auto-generated metadata comments can be disabled (no flag currently exists; consider exposing one).
🧹 Nitpick comments (5)
README.md (5)

16-25: Add VS2015 install path variant.

For Visual Studio 2015 the menu is Tools > Extensions and Updates, not Extensions > Manage Extensions. Add a note for VS2015 to avoid confusion.


69-80: Clarify WinUI 3 and .NET version support.

  • WinUI 3 (WinAppSDK) typically targets .NET 6+; consider updating “.NET 5+” to “.NET 6+” unless you’ve verified .NET 5.
  • If WinUI 3 is supported, call out that the generator uses the WinAppSDK resource APIs for WinUI 3 projects (different from UWP/WinUI 2).

I suggest amending bullets to specify the API differences or add a short note.


81-92: API callout likely UWP/WinUI 2 only; add WinUI 3 variant.

“The generated code uses Windows.ApplicationModel.Resources.ResourceLoader…” is accurate for UWP/WinUI 2. For WinUI 3, the common approach is Microsoft.Windows.ApplicationModel.Resources (ResourceManager). Add a sentence noting the WinUI 3 path and that the tool generates the appropriate API per project type, or scope support accordingly.


371-392: Correct default .resw location guidance for UWP/WinUI.

“Usually Properties/Resources.resw” is more typical in classic .NET. UWP/WinUI commonly uses Strings//Resources.resw (e.g., Strings/en-US/Resources.resw). Update to reflect both patterns.


409-414: Links section LGTM. Optionally add a link to release notes/changelog.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 3c5f47f and 0172388.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • README.md (7 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
README.md

[grammar] ~71-~71: There might be a mistake here.
Context: ...rsal Windows Platform (UWP) applications - Windows UI Library (WinUI) 2 and 3 appli...

(QB_NEW_EN)


[grammar] ~72-~72: There might be a mistake here.
Context: ... UI Library (WinUI) 2 and 3 applications - .NET 5+ WinUI applications - C# and Visu...

(QB_NEW_EN)


[grammar] ~73-~73: There might be a mistake here.
Context: ...pplications - .NET 5+ WinUI applications - C# and Visual Basic projects **Limitati...

(QB_NEW_EN)


[grammar] ~76-~76: There might be a mistake here.
Context: ...nd Visual Basic projects Limitations: - Only works with .resw files, not .resx f...

(QB_NEW_EN)


[grammar] ~85-~85: There might be a mistake here.
Context: ...rses the XML structure of the .resw file 2. Extracts resource keys and values 3. Gen...

(QB_NEW_EN)


[grammar] ~86-~86: There might be a mistake here.
Context: ...ile 2. Extracts resource keys and values 3. Generates a strongly-typed class with pr...

(QB_NEW_EN)


[grammar] ~87-~87: There might be a mistake here.
Context: ... class with properties for each resource 4. Handles dotted keys by replacing dots wi...

(QB_NEW_EN)


[grammar] ~88-~88: There might be a mistake here.
Context: ... keys by replacing dots with underscores 5. Adds XML documentation comments with the...

(QB_NEW_EN)

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (1)
  • GitHub Check: build
🔇 Additional comments (7)
README.md (7)

12-15: Intro reads well and sets context clearly.


34-43: Getting Started section is clear and actionable.


44-58: Configuration guidance looks good.


100-111: C# usage header/addition looks fine.


114-125: VB usage header/addition looks fine.


393-404: Contributing section LGTM.


405-408: License section LGTM.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant