Aj 6.1

[AaronJhaj]

No description provided.

[IvanHargreaves]

Just the one base library issue in comments.

[IvanHargreaves]

If we are base-lining on V6.1, we need to consider which EE level we are base-lining on too, and therefore what Java level will work, what feature levels we say to add in the server.xml, what Java/Liberty libraries are on the classpath of the Eclipse Project App, which versions of EE are pulled into the Gradle and POM stuff, and what xml namespace is used in the web.xml too. They all need to be made consistent and compatible, and then reflected in the README.

[AaronJhaj]

now that we are basing on java 17, i have removed java 8 and 11 from the gh action build

[IvanHargreaves]

I've added a couple of review comments, but note you've moved things to Jakarta EE 9, which is fine for now, until we get Explorer updated - then we should go to EE 10.

[IvanHargreaves]

Yep, maybe I reviewed too soon, it looks sorted now. Great.