I ran three readings with varying MTreg values (31, default, 200).
Across a range of light levels (in the 100-500 lux range), the lux value computed for MTreg=200 was wildly different to the other cases.
This makes me suspect that there is a bug, probably involving incorrect data types and/or integer division. This could be in the calculation of the time interval (this is tentatively confirmed by injecting my own time delay).
[version 1.3.0 used on ESP8266 arduino platform]
I ran three readings with varying MTreg values (31, default, 200).
Across a range of light levels (in the 100-500 lux range), the lux value computed for MTreg=200 was wildly different to the other cases.
This makes me suspect that there is a bug, probably involving incorrect data types and/or integer division. This could be in the calculation of the time interval (this is tentatively confirmed by injecting my own time delay).
[version 1.3.0 used on ESP8266 arduino platform]