[pre-commit.ci] pre-commit autoupdate

[pre-commit-ci]

updates:

• github.com/rvben/rumdl-pre-commit: v0.0.155 → v0.0.162

---

Important

Update rvben/rumdl-pre-commit hook version in .pre-commit-config.yaml from v0.0.155 to v0.0.162.

• Pre-commit Hook Update:
  • Update rvben/rumdl-pre-commit hook version from v0.0.155 to v0.0.162 in .pre-commit-config.yaml.

^{This description was created by for 3c9aa2a. You can customize this summary. It will automatically update as commits are pushed.}

[semanticdiff-com]

Review changes with  

Changed Files

File	Status
.pre-commit-config.yaml	0% smaller

[ellipsis-dev]

Important

Looks good to me! 👍

Reviewed everything up to 3c9aa2a in 2 minutes and 27 seconds. Click for details.

• Reviewed 13 lines of code in 1 files
• Skipped 0 files when reviewing.
• Skipped posting 1 draft comments. View those below.
• Modify your settings and rules to customize what types of comments Ellipsis leaves. And don't forget to react with 👍 or 👎 to teach Ellipsis.

1. .pre-commit-config.yaml:28

• Draft comment:
  Ensure the revision bump to v0.0.162 is intentional and stable. Consider pinning to a specific commit hash for reproducibility.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 0% vs. threshold = 50% The rules explicitly state "Do NOT comment on dependency changes, library versions that you don't recognize, or anything else related to dependencies." Additionally, the comment starts with "Ensure that..." which is also explicitly called out as not useful. This is a clear case where the comment should be deleted. Perhaps version pinning is a critical security best practice that overrides the general rule about dependency comments? No, the rules are very clear about not commenting on dependency changes, regardless of the reason. Additionally, the comment asks for verification rather than pointing out a clear issue. Delete this comment as it violates two rules: no dependency-related comments and no verification requests.

Workflow ID: wflow_EcX500cpvrDFxNT9

^{You can customize by changing your verbosity settings, reacting with 👍 or 👎, replying to comments, or adding code review rules.}

[llamapreview]

Auto Pull Request Review from LlamaPReview

Review Status: Automated Review Skipped

Dear contributor,

Thank you for your Pull Request. LlamaPReview has analyzed your changes and determined that this PR does not require an automated code review.

Analysis Result:

PR only contains version updates and formatting changes

Technical Context:

Version and formatting changes detected, which include:

• Package version updates
• Dependency version changes
• Code formatting adjustments
• Whitespace modifications
• Structural formatting changes

We're continuously improving our PR analysis capabilities. Have thoughts on when and how LlamaPReview should perform automated reviews? Share your insights in our GitHub Discussions.

Best regards,
LlamaPReview Team