Skip to content

Merge upstream#3

Merged
wojcikstefan merged 7 commits intomainfrom
merge-upstream
Feb 26, 2026
Merged

Merge upstream#3
wojcikstefan merged 7 commits intomainfrom
merge-upstream

Conversation

@andrewbarnhart
Copy link

@andrewbarnhart andrewbarnhart commented Feb 24, 2026

This is simply a sync with the upstream changes of this fork.

I had to add ts-node to make the tests pass. I have no idea why things work in the upstream but they don't here.

amonshiz and others added 6 commits August 7, 2025 19:26
Cancelled jobs mean they have started and so should be included in a
trace. Without the cancelled step there would appear to be a massive gap
in the trace. Skipped steps _should_ be excluded because they performed
no work and will be approximately always zero duration.

Fixes corentinmusard#56
@andrewbarnhart andrewbarnhart requested a review from nsaje February 24, 2026 16:32
Copy link
Member

@wojcikstefan wojcikstefan left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks Andrew!

@andrewbarnhart
Copy link
Author

@wojcikstefan Are you able to give me permission to merge this branch? It's telling me I'm blocked
Screenshot 2026-02-26 at 8 40 07 AM

@wojcikstefan wojcikstefan merged commit 60ce481 into main Feb 26, 2026
5 checks passed
@wojcikstefan
Copy link
Member

@andrewbarnhart I merged it just now, thanks!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants