Skip to content

Conversation

@bwesterb
Copy link
Member

@bwesterb bwesterb commented Sep 30, 2025

DNM. Testing if this fixes the Windows build for #391

@bwesterb bwesterb requested a review from cjpatton September 30, 2025 09:59
@bwesterb bwesterb changed the base branch from cjpatton/drop-pq-experimental to master September 30, 2025 09:59
cjpatton and others added 2 commits September 30, 2025 12:02
When set, these features cause boring-sys to apply patches to the source
before building BoringSSL. Instead, apply these patches unconditionally.
This matches the semantcis of pre-compiled BoringSSL, where the library
is expected to provide the features implemented by these patches.

We might want to do the same for "rpk", but currenlty our internal build
of boringSSL doesn't appear to supply the following APIs:

```
ffi::SSL_CTX_set_nullchain_and_key
ffi::SSL_CTX_set_server_raw_public_key_certificate
```
@bwesterb
Copy link
Member Author

Fixed in favour of #395

@bwesterb bwesterb closed this Sep 30, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants