update workers Next.js guide to work on @opennextjs/[email protected]

[dario-piotrowicz]

Summary

fixes #18936

This PR updates the outdated Next.js workers guide so that it can properly work with @opennextjs/[email protected]
(similarly to cloudflare/workers-sdk#7638)

Screenshots (optional)

Documentation checklist

• The documentation style guide has been adhered to.
• If a larger change - such as adding a new page- an issue has been opened in relation to any incorrect or out of date information that this PR fixes.

[cloudflare-workers-and-pages]

Deploying cloudflare-docs with    Cloudflare Pages

Latest commit:	d0aa567
Status:	✅  Deploy successful!
Preview URL:	https://22c0752b.cloudflare-docs-7ou.pages.dev
Branch Preview URL:	https://dario-next-experimental-open.cloudflare-docs-7ou.pages.dev

View logs

[github-actions]

Files with changes (up to 15)

Original Link	Updated Link
https://developers.cloudflare.com/workers/frameworks/framework-guides/nextjs/	https://dario-next-experimental-open.cloudflare-docs-7ou.pages.dev/workers/frameworks/framework-guides/nextjs/

[vicb]

LGTM

The c3 template has not yet been updated for 0.3. however the ON version is not pin to 0.2.x in the last c3 release (I submited a PR that got merged after the last release).

I'm not sure what's the best time to merge this PR. Either now or once the c3 template is updated.

I'll let you decide

[dario-piotrowicz]

LGTM

The c3 template has not yet been updated for 0.3. however the ON version is not pin to 0.2.x in the last c3 release (I submited a PR that got merged after the last release).

I'm not sure what's the best time to merge this PR. Either now or once the c3 template is updated.

I'll let you decide

Thanks 🙂

The part of the guide I've updated is under Existing Next.js apps so it is actually unrelated to C3, so I would say the sooner we merge this the better 🙂 (I linked this PR with the workers-sdk one just because those are loosely related)

So I'd just wait for a PCX review and then merge 🙂

[dario-piotrowicz]

@vicb the video tutorial is also outdated... we should probably do something about that too... I think we can either put a warning callout there saying that it is slightly outdated and maybe also point out what changed since the video was made or remove the video tutorial completely.

By far I prefer the latter as the former feels very unpolished and more costly to maintain to me, what do you think? do you have a preference here?

[dario-piotrowicz]

@megaconfidence as mentioned above (and discussed with Vic offline) we're removing your video tutorial, sorry about that 😓, maybe we can work together to get an updated version of it up? 😄