Skip to content

[Queues] Fix typo in Batching Retries #19684

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 3, 2025
Merged

[Queues] Fix typo in Batching Retries #19684

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion src/content/docs/queues/configuration/batching-retries.mdx
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -89,7 +89,7 @@ export default {

You can also acknowledge or negatively acknowledge messages at a batch level with `ackAll()` and `retryAll()`. Calling `ackAll()` on the batch of messages (`MessageBatch`) delivered to your consumer Worker has the same behaviour as a consumer Worker that successfully returns (does not throw an error).

Note that calls to `ack()`, `retry()` and their `ackAll()` / `retryAll` equivalents follow the below precedence rules:
Note that calls to `ack()`, `retry()` and their `ackAll()` / `retryAll()` equivalents follow the below precedence rules:

- If you call `ack()` on a message, subsequent calls to `ack()` or `retry()` are silently ignored.
- If you call `retry()` on a message and then call `ack()`: the `ack()` is ignored. The first method call wins in all cases.
Expand Down