Skip to content

Conversation

@jp4a50
Copy link
Contributor

@jp4a50 jp4a50 commented Mar 5, 2025

Summary

Screenshots (optional)

Documentation checklist

  • The documentation style guide has been adhered to.
  • If a larger change - such as adding a new page- an issue has been opened in relation to any incorrect or out of date information that this PR fixes.
  • Files which have changed name or location have been allocated redirects.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Mar 5, 2025

Howdy and thanks for contributing to our repo. We review internal PRs within 1 week. If it's something urgent or has been sitting without a comment, start a thread in the Developer Docs space internally.

entries:
- publish_date: "2025-02-28"
description: |-
- The new `queue_consumer_no_wait_for_wait_until` compatibility flag changes behaviour for queue consumers, changing their behavior such that (A) `waitUntil` promises do not need to complete before a queue consumer invocation can be considered complete, and (B) `waitUntil` promises failing do not cause the invocation as a whole to fail. Neither of these have been the case previously, allowing long-running or errant `waitUntil` tasks to (usually unintentionally) slow down or prevent successful message consumption.
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@a-robinson I made a couple of edits here e.g. adding the name of the compatibility flag itself.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks! Although would it be too hard to delay this until the next batch of release notes? A bug was found in the flag and a fix was just merged last night, and I wouldn't recommend anyone use it until that fix has rolled out.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Although on a more fun / less important note I like the different spellings of behaviour and behavior just a few words apart from each other :)

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sure. I'll remove this one for now and punt it to the next release notes cc @harrishancock

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Mar 5, 2025

@jp4a50 jp4a50 force-pushed the jphillips/update-ew-release-notes branch from ed9b1a6 to 88a4fb5 Compare March 5, 2025 18:25
@jp4a50 jp4a50 changed the title Update edgeworker release notes for this week's releases. Update edgeworker release notes for last week's releases. Mar 5, 2025
@jp4a50 jp4a50 merged commit ce000ab into production Mar 7, 2025
9 checks passed
@jp4a50 jp4a50 deleted the jphillips/update-ew-release-notes branch March 7, 2025 14:29
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants