Improvements in domain classes #2
Open
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Removed unnecessary volatile modifiers in domain classes Moved JsonProperty annotations to class fields to avoid duplication in contructor + getter Signed-off-by: Josh Hill <[email protected]>
|
Hey raulavila ! Thanks for submitting this pull request! All pull request authors must have a Contributor License Agreement (CLA) on-file with us. Please sign the appropriate CLA (individual or corporate). When sending signed CLA please provide your github username in case of individual CLA or the list of github usernames that can make pull requests on behalf of your organization. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Why
volatilemodifiers are not required in the domain classes' fields, as they're created by Spring Data and not shared in a multithreaded environment.JsonPropertyannotations can be associated to the field declaration when we want to use the name for that property in the input and output JSONs. This way we have removed duplication of the annotation.What