Conversation
91bd57d to
0aefe1c
Compare
|
@moleske regarding the database migration you mentioned. I think you may need to leave the Maybe add a timebomb test to remind us to remove it in the distant future? Example: |
|
I might skip the time bomb test cause it is unlikely I'll do something when it goes off. Though if others would like it I'll add it. Now that I see cloudfoundry/capi-ci#52 I'll try to actually run cats against (assuming I can actually get an environment) |
0aefe1c to
d81dcf8
Compare
|
I tried to claim a bosh lite but it seems to think there are none available. I left a message in the capi slack channel asking if I was just doing it wrong. I was able to create a bosh release with cloudfoundry/capi-release#419 but wasn't able to test if it deployed successfully due to the inability to claim a bosh lite. If someone else is able to give a whirl and run cats that would be helpful, or let me know how to correctly claim a bosh lite |
|
putting back in draft as I got a bosh lite and cats is failing. wonder if it is cf networking needing this or something else going on |
d81dcf8 to
6cb62f8
Compare
|
Edit - See latest comment here, bosh lite is working now! I'm reopening this for review. I'm having trouble with the bosh lite environment though, as even an unmodified capi version is causing me multiple bosh lite test failures (86!) with cf acceptance test version 16.4.0 maybe @Gerg has some suggestions on what I'm doing wrong with bosh lites, but will save that sort of conversation for slack. Would be thrilled to have others review this though. Will keep playing with bosh lite and see if I'm just doing something terrible in my windows subsystem for linux environment |
6cb62f8 to
ba9b2d0
Compare
|
Got this working on a bosh lite! cf acceptance test 16.4.0 is passing with the config generated. bosh lite is regent in the capi pool for those curious. Could use some reviews from folks next time you're passing through |
ba9b2d0 to
f0ee92a
Compare
f0ee92a to
2033fc6
Compare
2033fc6 to
af3c209
Compare
af3c209 to
1b71632
Compare
1b71632 to
cee89c4
Compare
|
I think we can go ahead and merge this. I also created a dev capi release and ran CATS against it and it ran through. From the code it does not look like this is used for anything anyways. Removing this can be done independently from removing it from capi-release. |
Changes in cloud_controller_ng:
- Remove vip usage
PR: cloudfoundry/cloud_controller_ng#3761
Author: M. Oleske <moleske@users.noreply.github.com>
Dependency updates in cloud_controller_ng:
- build(deps-dev): bump mock_redis from 0.50.0 to 0.51.0
PR: cloudfoundry/cloud_controller_ng#4464
Author: dependabot[bot] <49699333+dependabot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
- build(deps): bump nokogiri from 1.18.8 to 1.18.9
PR: cloudfoundry/cloud_controller_ng#4462
Author: dependabot[bot] <49699333+dependabot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Changes in cloud_controller_ng:
- Remove vip usage
PR: cloudfoundry/cloud_controller_ng#3761
Author: M. Oleske <moleske@users.noreply.github.com>
Dependency updates in cloud_controller_ng:
- build(deps): bump thor from 1.3.2 to 1.4.0
PR: cloudfoundry/cloud_controller_ng#4466
Author: dependabot[bot] <49699333+dependabot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
- build(deps-dev): bump mock_redis from 0.50.0 to 0.51.0
PR: cloudfoundry/cloud_controller_ng#4464
Author: dependabot[bot] <49699333+dependabot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
- build(deps): bump nokogiri from 1.18.8 to 1.18.9
PR: cloudfoundry/cloud_controller_ng#4462
Author: dependabot[bot] <49699333+dependabot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
migration needed to drop vip, I apparently can't remember how to write migrations in rubynot doing that for this pass#3712
Thanks for contributing to cloud_controller_ng. To speed up the process of reviewing your pull request please provide us with:
A short explanation of the proposed change:
An explanation of the use cases your change solves
Links to any other associated PRs
Remove vip usage capi-release#419
I have reviewed the contributing guide
I have viewed, signed, and submitted the Contributor License Agreement
I have made this pull request to the
mainbranchI have run all the unit tests using
bundle exec rakeI have run CF Acceptance Tests