Skip to content

ADR: Use Bosh Storage CLIs for Blobstore Operations #4443

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 6 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

johha
Copy link
Contributor

@johha johha commented Jul 10, 2025

ADR to introduce support for the bosh storage CLIs as a replacement for fog.

Link for easy viewing

philippthun
philippthun previously approved these changes Jul 15, 2025
Copy link
Member

@philippthun philippthun left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍

provider: AzureRM
max_package_size: 1610612736
```
* Parameters like `fog_connection` may be renamed after the transition period.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I would not define a "legacy fog_configuration" in an ADR but specify how such a configuration should really look like (of course, details can be worked out during implementation). Opt-in can easily be achieved by an ops file independent of the configuration format. Renaming bosh config parameters after a transition period is pain. Remember the experimental/temporary discussion for enabling Puma in cloudfoundry/capi-release#483.

Questions for the configuration:

  • blobstore_type: generic storage-cli or specific types per IaaS (e.g. bosh-azure-storage-cli)
  • connection_config (e.g. instead of fog_connection): generic (unvalidated) hash or blobstore type specific configuration

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I specified the config changes in more detail

stephanme
stephanme previously approved these changes Jul 16, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants