Skip to content

Conversation

@Benbentwo
Copy link
Contributor

@Benbentwo Benbentwo commented Jun 26, 2025

This pull request includes a version constraint update for the AWS provider in the Terraform configuration file src/versions.tf. The change ensures compatibility with versions up to but not including 6.0.0.

  • src/versions.tf: Updated the version constraint for the aws provider to >= 4.9.0, < 6.0.0 to ensure compatibility with future versions while avoiding potential breaking changes in version 6.0.0.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated AWS provider version constraints to allow versions from 4.9.0 up to, but not including, 6.0.0 in the Terraform configuration.
    • Upgraded the version of the "eks/alb-controller" component to improve compatibility and performance.

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jun 26, 2025

Walkthrough

The AWS provider version constraint in the Terraform configuration was updated to specify both a minimum and a maximum version, now requiring versions >= 4.9.0 and < 6.0.0. Additionally, the "eks/alb-controller" component version in the vendor configuration was updated from v1.535.1 to v1.537.1.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
src/versions.tf Updated AWS provider version constraint to add "< 6.0.0" upper bound
test/fixtures/vendor.yaml Updated "eks/alb-controller" component version from v1.535.1 to v1.537.1

Poem

A tweak to the clouds, a version in hand,
Now AWS stands on a firmer land.
From 4.9 to just before six,
Our Terraform code avoids risky tricks.
The alb-controller got a little lift,
With v1.537, it’s a nifty gift! 🐇✨


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between fc2045a and fe7d7d9.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • test/fixtures/vendor.yaml (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • test/fixtures/vendor.yaml
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
  • GitHub Check: Summary

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@mergify mergify bot requested review from a team June 26, 2025 16:55
@mergify mergify bot added the triage Needs triage label Jun 26, 2025
goruha
goruha previously approved these changes Jun 26, 2025
@mergify mergify bot removed the triage Needs triage label Jun 26, 2025
@Benbentwo Benbentwo added this pull request to the merge queue Jun 26, 2025
@github-merge-queue github-merge-queue bot removed this pull request from the merge queue due to failed status checks Jun 26, 2025
@Benbentwo Benbentwo added this pull request to the merge queue Jun 26, 2025
@github-merge-queue github-merge-queue bot removed this pull request from the merge queue due to failed status checks Jun 26, 2025
@Benbentwo Benbentwo added this pull request to the merge queue Jun 26, 2025
@github-merge-queue github-merge-queue bot removed this pull request from the merge queue due to failed status checks Jun 26, 2025
@Benbentwo Benbentwo added this pull request to the merge queue Jun 26, 2025
@github-merge-queue github-merge-queue bot removed this pull request from the merge queue due to failed status checks Jun 26, 2025
@Benbentwo Benbentwo added this pull request to the merge queue Jun 28, 2025
@github-merge-queue github-merge-queue bot removed this pull request from the merge queue due to failed status checks Jun 28, 2025
@goruha goruha added this pull request to the merge queue Jun 30, 2025
@github-merge-queue github-merge-queue bot removed this pull request from the merge queue due to failed status checks Jun 30, 2025
@mergify mergify bot added the needs-test Needs testing label Jun 30, 2025
@goruha goruha added this pull request to the merge queue Jun 30, 2025
@github-merge-queue github-merge-queue bot removed this pull request from the merge queue due to failed status checks Jun 30, 2025
@goruha
Copy link
Contributor

goruha commented Jun 30, 2025

/terratest

@goruha
Copy link
Contributor

goruha commented Jun 30, 2025

/terratest

1 similar comment
@goruha
Copy link
Contributor

goruha commented Jun 30, 2025

/terratest

@goruha goruha merged commit 072710d into main Jun 30, 2025
19 checks passed
@goruha goruha deleted the pin-providers branch June 30, 2025 19:10
@github-actions
Copy link

These changes were released in v1.536.2.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

needs-test Needs testing

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants