-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 221
chore: add optional parent boundary clamping for popover trigger positioning #4344
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
14 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
f99b7a0
feat(popover): add optional parent boundary clamping for popover trig…
jsilll 3661f47
refactor(popover): simplify track rect clamping logic
jsilll 868ecf7
fix(popover): simplify track rect clamping logic
jsilll a6b5a9e
refactor(popover): extract rect clamping logic and add tests
jsilll 7899dc1
refactor(popover): improve type safety and mutate rect directly in cl…
jsilll 4a5ea43
test(popover): add test for parentRef passed to usePopoverPosition
jsilll 562cb5e
refactor(popover): rename parentRect parameter to bounds in clampRect…
jsilll 88dff5c
refactor(popover): make clampRectStart function immutable
jsilll 843e241
fix: improve clampRectStart to clamp both position and size
jsilll ad2c82d
test: refactor clampRectStart tests with helper function
jsilll f22680b
refactor(popover): make bounds parameter optional in clampRect function
jsilll 4f229bd
refactor(popover): rename parentRef to triggerClampRef
jsilll 8cd39b8
chore: rename parentRef to triggerClampRef and clampRectStart to clam…
jsilll 620c8e5
Merge branch 'main' into main
jsilll File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
Some comments aren't visible on the classic Files Changed page.
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can you add unit testing coverage for this new logic?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, sure! I just wanted to get your feedback on the implementation first.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks! Note, Codecov is still complaining about line 280 below not being covered. You might want to either add coverage for
getClampedTrackRectspecifically, or some case(s) for the popover component using a value forparent(if not too complicated, I'd personally prefer the latter, because it would test the integration of the logic in the component rather than in isolation).There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I agree with the latter approach as well!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for adding the test, although Codecov still complains about line 280 not being covered. Could this be because by asserting
you are only ever checking the first call, which corresponds to when the ref is null?