Skip to content

docs: fix inconsistency for package_deny_policy#166

Open
lvthillo wants to merge 1 commit intocloudsmith-io:masterfrom
lvthillo:fix-inconsistent-docs
Open

docs: fix inconsistency for package_deny_policy#166
lvthillo wants to merge 1 commit intocloudsmith-io:masterfrom
lvthillo:fix-inconsistent-docs

Conversation

@lvthillo
Copy link

No description provided.

@lvthillo lvthillo requested a review from a team as a code owner February 20, 2026 10:06
Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings February 20, 2026 10:06
Copy link

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

This PR fixes documentation inconsistencies for the package_deny_policy feature by properly separating the resource and data source documentation into their respective files. Previously, the resource documentation file incorrectly showed a data source example instead of a resource example.

Changes:

  • Updated docs/resources/package_deny_policy.md with correct resource example usage and improved formatting
  • Created new docs/data-sources/package_deny_policy.md with proper data source documentation
  • Added Import section to the resource documentation with correct import format

Reviewed changes

Copilot reviewed 2 out of 2 changed files in this pull request and generated no comments.

File Description
docs/resources/package_deny_policy.md Corrected example from data source to resource usage, improved description, standardized formatting with asterisk bullets, added Import section
docs/data-sources/package_deny_policy.md New file properly documenting the package_deny_policy data source with example usage and attribute reference

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants