Replacing"TMath.h" usage in favor of CMath#48716
Conversation
Root update cms-sw/cmsdist#10005 failing due to missing #include "TMath.h" in EcalPerEvtLaserAnalyzer.cc
|
cms-bot internal usage |
|
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-48716/45757 |
|
A new Pull Request was created by @akritkbehera for master. It involves the following packages:
@atpathak, @cmsbuild, @perrotta can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
|
please test |
|
+1 Size: This PR adds an extra 24KB to repository The following merge commits were also included on top of IB + this PR after doing git cms-merge-topic: You can see more details here: Comparison SummarySummary:
|
|
@iarspider , looks like there are few other packages which are failing https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-a23b57/47646/build-logs/ , can you update this PR to provide a fix for those too? |
|
@iarspider , looks like root has replaced the use of |
|
@smuzaffar did you mean @akritkbehera ? I just triggered the tests. But of course I can do it as well. |
|
oops, yes @akritkbehera |
|
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-48716/45759 |
|
+simulation |
|
+alca |
|
+dqm |
|
+Upgrade |
|
@alja , can you please again sign it for @cms-sw/visualization-l2 ? |
|
@cms-sw/l1-l2 , can you please review this? |
|
+1 |
|
@BenjaminRS , @quinnanm can you please review this PR . It just replaces the use of |
|
+l1 |
|
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @sextonkennedy, @mandrenguyen, @rappoccio, @antoniovilela (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
|
+1 |
PR description:
Root update cms-sw/cmsdist#10005 failing due to missing #include "TMath.h" in EcalPerEvtLaserAnalyzer.cc