Conversation
✅ Deploy Preview for cncf-license-exceptions canceled.
|
Signed-off-by: Christoph Stäbler <cstabler@redhat.com>
d694bbf to
7735eed
Compare
Signed-off-by: Daniel Krook <krook@linux.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Krook <krook@linux.com>
|
Hello @krook, |
No, nothing additional needed. We just have a bit of a backlog processing these due to some team travel. Should be sorted soon. |
|
@creydr looking a your PR. Can you please consolidate the change to have only one list for the project? Thank you. |
Oh no. Sorry, my bad I must have overseen it. I updated the list now |
Signed-off-by: Christoph Stäbler <cstabler@redhat.com>
704d090 to
8cdc46b
Compare
Signed-off-by: Riaan Kleinhans <61125752+riaankleinhans@users.noreply.github.com>
|
@creydr there is miss match between this list and the project repo list. |
@riaankleinhans do they need to match 1:1? Because I added in this PR here only the ones I know they are active (so this PR should be at least a subset of the ones from the Maintainers file) |
|
The idea is a one to one match. Based on the match we give maintainers access to CNCF service desk, maintainer mailing list, CNCF service desk, Github copilot etc. |
|
Thanks for the quick response @riaankleinhans.
That's the reason, why I am adding some maintainers (including myself) to this list
My issue is that I can't speak for all of them. I thought the other could then add themself to the CNCF repo if they want. Should I then only create a PR to add the users without updating the link to the maintainers list? |
Checklist for maintainer updates