Skip to content

Conversation

@arulajmani
Copy link
Collaborator

Previously, we incorrectly assumed every locking request waiting in the lock table was doing so with Exclusive lock strength when returning output for the cluster locks table.

Epic: none

Release note: None

Previously, we incorrectly assumed every locking request waiting in
the lock table was doing so with Exclusive lock strength when returning
output for the cluster locks table.

Epic: none

Release note: None
@arulajmani arulajmani requested a review from a team as a code owner November 20, 2025 23:00
@cockroach-teamcity
Copy link
Member

This change is Reviewable

Copy link
Collaborator

@stevendanna stevendanna left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You beat me to it :D

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants