Skip to content

Conversation

@yuzefovich
Copy link
Member

@yuzefovich yuzefovich commented Jan 5, 2026

Backport 1/1 commits from #160209 on behalf of @yuzefovich.


We already skip tpcc in bigInitialData, and I think it was a mistake that tpccmultidb wasn't marked in the same way. In particular, this will make it so that we don't run some of the test cases.

The reason I was looking into this is that TestAllRegisteredSetup/tpccmultidb took 9 minutes on CI with external process mode. I couldn't quickly speed that up (e.g. exempting from rate limiting didn't help), but skipping it will work just fine.

Epic: None
Release note: None


Release justification: test-only change.

We already skip `tpcc` in `bigInitialData`, and I think it was a mistake
that `tpccmultidb` wasn't marked in the same way. In particular, this
will make it so that we don't run some of the test cases.

The reason I was looking into this is that
`TestAllRegisteredSetup/tpccmultidb` took 9 minutes on CI with external
process mode. I couldn't quickly speed that up (e.g. exempting from rate
limiting didn't help), but skipping it will work just fine.

Release note: None
@yuzefovich yuzefovich requested a review from a team as a code owner January 5, 2026 04:42
@yuzefovich yuzefovich requested review from nameisbhaskar and shailendra-patel and removed request for a team January 5, 2026 04:42
@blathers-crl blathers-crl bot added blathers-backport This is a backport that Blathers created automatically. O-robot Originated from a bot. labels Jan 5, 2026
@blathers-crl
Copy link

blathers-crl bot commented Jan 5, 2026

Thanks for opening a backport.

Before merging, please confirm that the change does not break backwards compatibility and otherwise complies with the backport policy. Include a brief release justification in the PR description explaining why the backport is appropriate. All backports must be reviewed by the TL for the owning area. While the stricter LTS policy does not yet apply, please exercise judgment and consider gating non-critical changes behind a disabled-by-default feature flag when appropriate.

@blathers-crl blathers-crl bot requested review from fqazi and williamchoe3 January 5, 2026 04:42
@blathers-crl blathers-crl bot added backport Label PR's that are backports to older release branches T-sql-queries SQL Queries Team labels Jan 5, 2026
@cockroach-teamcity
Copy link
Member

This change is Reviewable

@yuzefovich yuzefovich requested a review from srosenberg January 5, 2026 04:43
@blathers-crl blathers-crl bot added backport-failed backport-test-only Used to denote the backport has only non-production changes and removed backport-failed labels Jan 5, 2026
@yuzefovich yuzefovich merged commit 979295f into cockroachdb:release-25.4 Jan 5, 2026
25 of 26 checks passed
@yuzefovich yuzefovich deleted the blathers/backport-release-25.4-160209 branch January 5, 2026 09:20
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

backport Label PR's that are backports to older release branches backport-test-only Used to denote the backport has only non-production changes blathers-backport This is a backport that Blathers created automatically. O-robot Originated from a bot. T-sql-queries SQL Queries Team target-release-25.4.4

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants