Skip to content

Conversation

@pull
Copy link

@pull pull bot commented Feb 1, 2025

See Commits and Changes for more details.


Created by pull[bot] (v2.0.0-alpha.1)

Can you help keep this open source service alive? 💖 Please sponsor : )

michaelfaith and others added 3 commits January 31, 2025 14:32
… migration (#32279)

<!--
  Thanks for submitting a pull request!
We appreciate you spending the time to work on these changes. Please
provide enough information so that others can review your pull request.
The three fields below are mandatory.

Before submitting a pull request, please make sure the following is
done:

1. Fork [the repository](https://github.com/facebook/react) and create
your branch from `main`.
  2. Run `yarn` in the repository root.
3. If you've fixed a bug or added code that should be tested, add tests!
4. Ensure the test suite passes (`yarn test`). Tip: `yarn test --watch
TestName` is helpful in development.
5. Run `yarn test --prod` to test in the production environment. It
supports the same options as `yarn test`.
6. If you need a debugger, run `yarn test --debug --watch TestName`,
open `chrome://inspect`, and press "Inspect".
7. Format your code with
[prettier](https://github.com/prettier/prettier) (`yarn prettier`).
8. Make sure your code lints (`yarn lint`). Tip: `yarn linc` to only
check changed files.
  9. Run the [Flow](https://flowtype.org/) type checks (`yarn flow`).
  10. If you haven't already, complete the CLA.

Learn more about contributing:
https://reactjs.org/docs/how-to-contribute.html
-->

## Summary

Contributing to #32240, this
change adds the dev dependencies needed to support the migration of the
plugin to typescript.
## Summary

When lookup `Parent`, `HostRoot` and `HostPortal` should be merged,
because when creating a `Portal`, it will also include
`containerInfo`(So we can directly use this `containerInfo` to delete
the real DOM nodes.), so there is no need to handle them separately.

## How did you test this change?

No behavior changes, all existing tests pass.
Hacky retry pipeline for when transforming `fire(...)` calls encounters
validation, todo, or memoization invariant bailouts. Would love feedback
on how we implement this to be extensible to other compiler
non-memoization features (e.g. inlineJSX)

Some observations:
- Compiler "front-end" passes (e.g. lower, type, effect, and mutability
inferences) should be shared for all compiler features -- memo and
otherwise
- Many passes (anything dealing with reactive scope ranges, scope blocks
/ dependencies, and optimizations such as ReactiveIR #31974) can be left
out of the retry pipeline. This PR hackily skips memoization features by
removing reactive scope creation, but we probably should restructure the
pipeline to skip these entirely on a retry
- We should maintain a canonical set of "validation flags"

Note the newly added fixtures are prefixed with `bailout-...` when the
retry fire pipeline is used. These fixture outputs contain correctly
inserted `useFire` calls and no memoization.
@pull pull bot added the ⤵️ pull label Feb 1, 2025
@pull pull bot merged commit 152bfe3 into code:main Feb 1, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants