Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Jun 13, 2025. It is now read-only.

Conversation

@ajay-sentry
Copy link
Contributor

Purpose/Motivation

This PR removes an unused field to help cleanup the plan types that we have and reduce some noise. If we plan on combining the types into one in the future this will make our life just a little bit easier.

Closes codecov/engineering-team#3141

Notes to Reviewer

No references in gazebo that I could see, this looks safe to remove.

Legal Boilerplate

Look, I get it. The entity doing business as "Sentry" was incorporated in the State of Delaware in 2015 as Functional Software, Inc. In 2022 this entity acquired Codecov and as result Sentry is going to need some rights from me in order to utilize my contributions in this PR. So here's the deal: I retain all rights, title and interest in and to my contributions, and by keeping this boilerplate intact I confirm that Sentry can use, modify, copy, and redistribute my contributions, under Sentry's choice of terms.

@ajay-sentry ajay-sentry requested a review from a team as a code owner December 20, 2024 18:37
)
value: String!
billingRate: String
baseUnitPrice: Int!
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

sorting these in ascending order for easier parsing

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

doing the lords work 🙏

@codecov-notifications
Copy link

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found.

📢 Thoughts on this report? Let us know!

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 20, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 96.02%. Comparing base (f80d9d2) to head (16256ce).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1070      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   96.02%   96.02%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         828      828              
  Lines       19447    19441       -6     
==========================================
- Hits        18674    18668       -6     
  Misses        773      773              
Flag Coverage Δ
unit 92.29% <ø> (-0.01%) ⬇️
unit-latest-uploader 92.29% <ø> (-0.01%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

✅ All tests successful. No failed tests were found.

📣 Thoughts on this report? Let Codecov know! | Powered by Codecov

Copy link
Contributor

@spalmurray-codecov spalmurray-codecov left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

@ajay-sentry ajay-sentry added this pull request to the merge queue Dec 20, 2024
Merged via the queue into main with commit 9958e78 Dec 20, 2024
18 of 19 checks passed
@ajay-sentry ajay-sentry deleted the Ajay/remove-deprecated-plan-name-field branch December 20, 2024 21:33
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Remove Deprecated PlanName field from Plan / PlanRepresentation

3 participants