⚡️ Speed up method Rank.from_dict by 5%
#9
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
📄 5% (0.05x) speedup for
Rank.from_dictinchromadb/execution/expression/operator.py⏱️ Runtime :
135 microseconds→128 microseconds(best of38runs)📝 Explanation and details
The optimized code achieves a 5% speedup through several key micro-optimizations that reduce dictionary lookups and improve memory efficiency:
Key Optimizations:
Dictionary Access Optimization in SparseVector.from_dict(): Changed
d.get(TYPE_KEY)to direct accessd[TYPE_KEY]since we validate the exact value anyway, eliminating redundant lookups.Reduced Variable Lookups in Rank.from_dict(): Added
val = data[op]to cache the operator's value, avoiding repeated dictionary lookups likedata["$val"],data["$knn"], etc. This single optimization reduces ~48 dictionary accesses per call.Memory-Efficient List Processing:
normalize_embeddings(): Replaced[row for row in target]withlist(target)for numpy arrays, avoiding unnecessary list comprehensionvalidate_embeddings(): Used generator expressions(isinstance(e, np.ndarray) for e in embeddings)instead of list comprehensions forall()checks, reducing memory allocationTuple vs List for Constants: Changed
embedding.dtype not in [...]toembedding.dtype not in (...)using tuples instead of lists for membership testing, providing faster lookups.Direct Result Computation: For operators like
$sumand$mul, eliminated intermediate list creation by directly iterating and accumulating results instead of building complete lists first.Performance Impact: These optimizations are particularly effective for test cases with complex nested rank expressions and multiple operator evaluations, where the dictionary lookup reductions and memory efficiency improvements compound. The 5% speedup demonstrates how micro-optimizations in frequently called parsing/validation code can yield measurable performance gains.
✅ Correctness verification report:
⚙️ Existing Unit Tests and Runtime
test_api.py::TestRankFromDict.test_aggregation_functionstest_api.py::TestRankFromDict.test_arithmetic_operatorstest_api.py::TestRankFromDict.test_complex_rank_expressiontest_api.py::TestRankFromDict.test_invalid_rank_dictstest_api.py::TestRankFromDict.test_knn_conversiontest_api.py::TestRankFromDict.test_math_functionstest_api.py::TestRankFromDict.test_val_conversiontest_api.py::TestRoundTripConversion.test_rank_round_trip🔎 Concolic Coverage Tests and Runtime
codeflash_concolic_aqrniplu/tmpeg9rml_6/test_concolic_coverage.py::test_Rank_from_dictcodeflash_concolic_aqrniplu/tmpeg9rml_6/test_concolic_coverage.py::test_Rank_from_dict_2codeflash_concolic_aqrniplu/tmpeg9rml_6/test_concolic_coverage.py::test_Rank_from_dict_3codeflash_concolic_aqrniplu/tmpeg9rml_6/test_concolic_coverage.py::test_Rank_from_dict_4codeflash_concolic_aqrniplu/tmpeg9rml_6/test_concolic_coverage.py::test_Rank_from_dict_5codeflash_concolic_aqrniplu/tmpeg9rml_6/test_concolic_coverage.py::test_Rank_from_dict_6codeflash_concolic_aqrniplu/tmpeg9rml_6/test_concolic_coverage.py::test_Rank_from_dict_7To edit these changes
git checkout codeflash/optimize-Rank.from_dict-mh1j5b4iand push.