⚡️ Speed up function sorter by 125,980%
#272
Closed
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
📄 125,980% (1,259.80x) speedup for
sorterincode_to_optimize/bubble_sort.py⏱️ Runtime :
4.93 seconds→3.91 milliseconds(best of63runs)📝 Explanation and details
Here’s a faster rewrite of your function, using Python's built-in
list.sort()method, which is implemented in C and highly optimized (Timsort algorithm). The functionality (in terms of output and in-place sorting) and print statements are preserved.Why it's faster
list.sort()is O(N log N) for most inputs and runs in optimized C code.If, for some reason, you must not use built-in sort and need a manual fast implementation, a simple in-place quicksort or mergesort would still be much faster than bubble sort. But
arr.sort()is fastest and most idiomatic in Python.✅ Correctness verification report:
⚙️ Existing Unit Tests Details
🌀 Generated Regression Tests Details
To edit these changes
git checkout codeflash/optimize-sorter-mbg6c8vcand push.