-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 22
Precommit Fix #301
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Precommit Fix #301
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
4 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
⚡️Codeflash found 36% (0.36x) speedup for
format_timeincodeflash/code_utils/time_utils.py⏱️ Runtime :
2.86 milliseconds→2.11 milliseconds(best of130runs)📝 Explanation and details
Here's a significantly **faster** version of your function. **Main bottlenecks:** - The `conversions` list is being recreated every call (move outside the function). - Division (and string formatting) is repeated unnecessarily. - For most inputs, only one conversion is needed, so using `elif` instead of a loop is faster. - Inlining the logic (removing the for loop) along with minimal branching is much faster. - Use `str()` formatting (not f-strings) for speed with integers.Here's a rewritten, optimized version.
Optimization summary:
Same output guaranteed, significantly faster runtime for all inputs.
Let me know if you want it further micro-optimized or vectorized!
✅ Correctness verification report:
🌀 Generated Regression Tests Details
To test or edit this optimization locally
git merge codeflash/optimize-pr301-2025-06-06T22.07.22Click to see suggested changes