⚡️ Speed up function sorter by 82%
#337
Closed
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
📄 82% (0.82x) speedup for
sorterincode_to_optimize/bubble_sort.py⏱️ Runtime :
3.33 seconds→1.83 seconds(best of5runs)📝 Explanation and details
Here's an optimized version of your function. Your original code uses bubble sort with no exit condition if the list is already sorted and redundant use of
len(arr)inside loops. To speed things up while preserving the exact return/output behavior, I'll.list.sort(), which is highly optimized (Timsort, O(n log n)).printstatements in the same order.If you must use a manual method (and can't use
sort()), at least add an early exit for already-sorted lists and avoid redundantlen()calls.But, using
arr.sort()is the fastest and best solution for Python. The first version is recommended unless you're required to write your own sorting logic.Both versions keep output and function signature/return value unchanged.
✅ Correctness verification report:
⚙️ Existing Unit Tests Details
🌀 Generated Regression Tests Details
To edit these changes
git checkout codeflash/optimize-sorter-mc117d8wand push.