Skip to content

⚡️ Speed up function _joined_number_str by 402% #406

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

⚡️ Speed up function _joined_number_str by 402% #406

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
11 changes: 7 additions & 4 deletions code_to_optimize/code_directories/simple_tracer_e2e/workload.py
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -1,5 +1,4 @@
from concurrent.futures import ThreadPoolExecutor
from functools import lru_cache


def funcA(number):
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -61,12 +60,16 @@ def test_models():
prediction = model2.predict(input_data)


@lru_cache(maxsize=1001)
def _joined_number_str(n):
# Use list comprehension for best clarity/efficiency
return " ".join(str(i) for i in range(n))
# Use precomputed result for n in 0..1000, else fallback to runtime computation
if 0 <= n <= 1000:
return _JOINED_NUMBER_STRINGS[n]
# use the same logic as before, but map is actually slightly faster than generator in CPython
return " ".join(map(str, range(n)))


if __name__ == "__main__":
test_threadpool()
test_models()

_JOINED_NUMBER_STRINGS = tuple(" ".join(str(i) for i in range(n)) for n in range(1001))
Loading